Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

06:16
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
782
Potential Economic Value of Multi-cancer Early Detection Testing Under Differential Cost Trends for Cancer Screening
Anuraag R Kansal1, Ali Tafazzoli2, Weicheng Ye3
1GRAIL, Inc., 1525 O'Brien Drive, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA. akansal@grailbio.com.
Pharmacoeconomics - Open
|December 23, 2025
Summary
Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests can lower cancer management costs. Cost neutrality is achievable within 5-10 years if cancer management costs rise faster than MCED screening costs.
Area of Science:
- Health economics
- Oncology
- Medical technology assessment
Background:
- Cancer management costs are rising, while screening costs are stable.
- Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests offer potential for earlier cancer diagnosis.
- Evaluating the economic impact of MCED is crucial given current healthcare cost trends.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness and net cost of MCED testing in the US.
- To analyze the influence of differing cost growth rates on MCED economic viability.
- To compare MCED cost-effectiveness from commercial insurance and Medicare perspectives.
Main Methods:
- A hybrid state-transition and decision-tree model was used for lifetime analysis.
- Cost data were sourced from SEER-Medicare, with MCED prices set at $949 or $712.
- Annual cost growth rates (-5% to 10%) were applied to management and screening costs.
Main Results:
- MCED's incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $50,000-$100,000/QALY without cost growth.
- MCED reduced spending when cancer management cost growth exceeded 2-4% (commercial) or 7-8% (Medicare).
- Cost neutrality was reached in 5-10 years if management costs grew faster than MCED costs.
Conclusions:
- MCED testing may offset rising cancer management expenses.
- Improved cost-effectiveness and potential cost neutrality are associated with MCED.
- The economic benefits of MCED are sensitive to relative cost growth rates.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
626
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
626
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
5.8K
Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.8K

