Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
The adaptive tasks and trade-offs that drive the human value system
Noam Markovitch1,2, Dan Hilman Amir3,4, Rony Zer Kavod3
1Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. noam.markovitch@mail.huji.ac.il.
Human values are shaped by balancing adaptive tasks: Self-enhancement, Growth, and Conservation. Pareto analysis reveals these drivers are robust across diverse populations, offering insights into individual differences.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Sociology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Human values significantly influence behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs.
- Understanding the fundamental drivers of the human value system is crucial for psychological and sociological research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the core drivers shaping individual variations in human values.
- To investigate the adaptive tasks and trade-offs underlying value systems using Pareto analysis.
- To examine the robustness of these drivers across diverse demographic and cultural groups.
Main Methods:
- Employed Pareto analysis, an optimization framework, on a large dataset from the European Social Survey (N=411,904).
- Analyzed individual differences in values by assessing trade-offs between identified adaptive tasks.
- Validated findings across global samples, multiple countries, varying religiosity levels, and age groups.
Main Results:
- Individual differences in values are primarily linked to balancing trade-offs between three adaptive tasks: Self-enhancement, Growth, and Conservation.
- Value combinations representing non-adaptive trade-off solutions were notably absent in the empirical data.
- The identified adaptive tasks and their trade-offs demonstrated robustness across diverse populations and contexts.
Conclusions:
- Pareto analysis effectively identifies adaptive tasks and trade-offs that drive human value systems.
- The findings provide a principled approach to understanding individual differences and the etiology of psychological systems.
- Future research can explore the underlying mechanisms and developmental shifts in these adaptive tasks.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Adler's Individual Psychology
Social Exchange Theory