Golden hour(s) quality improvement protocols and their effect on outcomes in preterm infants ≤ 32 weeks of gestation:

Leonore M C Wever1, Vilya Nous2, Marije Hogeveen2

  • 1Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. Leonore.Wever@vub.be.

BMC Pediatrics
|December 24, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Golden Hour (GH) protocols for preterm infants improve survival and reduce complications. However, variations in protocol components and outcomes necessitate standardized guidelines for optimal neonatal care.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Pediatric Critical Care
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Prematurity is a leading global cause of mortality in children under five.
  • The initial hours post-birth (Golden Hours) are critical for preterm infant stabilization and impact long-term outcomes.
  • Existing Golden Hour protocols show variability in components and reported results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review Golden Hour (GH) protocols for preterm infants.
  • Identify common elements, implementation variations, and clinical outcomes associated with GH protocols.
  • Inform best practices and highlight knowledge gaps in GH protocol implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
  • Three-step search strategy including database and reference screening.
  • Data extraction on study characteristics, GH protocol components, and outcomes; quality assessed using QI-MQCS checklist.

Main Results:

  • 34 studies included preterm infants (24.4-30.2 weeks GA).
  • Common GH protocol elements included respiratory support, cardiovascular support, thermoregulation, and team-based interventions.
  • GH protocols were associated with reduced mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, and increased delayed cord clamping.

Conclusions:

  • GH protocols show benefits for preterm infant morbidity and mortality but exhibit significant variability.
  • Differences in populations, resources, and methods limit cross-study comparisons.
  • Standardized guidelines and outcome measures are crucial for refining GH protocols and improving neonatal outcomes.
Abstract