Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Development and validation of trigger tool for multimorbid patients (MUltimorbid Patients-Estonian Trigger Tool). A
Angela Kannukene1,2, Carola Orrego3,4, Margus Lember1,2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Background:
Adverse events in healthcare are common due to complexity of care. Multimorbid patients may be at higher risk because multiple chronic diseases and medications can affect and interfere with each other and the treatment. We describe the development and validation process of a novel trigger tool for evaluating adverse events in hospitalized multimorbid patients.
Methods:
This is a mixed-methods study. We used literature review to collect triggers, removed irrelevant triggers according to face validity, translated the triggers to Estonian with two translators and chose the best translation, and selected the triggers for preliminary tool with an expert panel. A pilot study was conducted on using both trigger tool and manual chart review on the same charts for validation. Corrections were made to the trigger tool. Final validation was conducted with the trigger tool and a manual review on the same 90 charts as a reference standard.
Results:
After literature review, translations and expert panels the preliminary tool had 62 triggers. After piloting on 88 charts, 21 triggers were removed. For validation, we used manual chart review on the same charts as a reference standard. The final trigger tool has 41 triggers and against reference standard it showed sensitivity of 0.61, specificity of 0.85, positive predictive value of 0.79, and negative predictive value of 0.70. With the trigger tool, 61% of the charts had at least one trigger and the prevalence of charts with adverse events was 38%. The length of stay was significantly higher with patients who experienced an adverse event.
Conclusion:
We introduce a novel validated trigger tool for multimorbid hospitalized patients. This study explains the development and validation of the trigger. We recommend this tool for measuring adverse events in hospitalized multimorbid patients. The preliminary results indicate that this population may have higher prevalence of adverse events than previously reported in general inpatient populations.
