Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting and Sleep consortium (ProPASS): addressing methodological and geographical barriers to inform global public health guidelines, interventions and precision medicine.

British journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

An open-access multi-site fMRI dataset for investigating conscious visual perception.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Individual differences in risk preference: Selection and socialization effects.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same author

Emergence of autochthonous <i>Leishmania infantum</i> infection in dogs from Costa Rica confirmed by multimodal diagnostics: a case series.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2026
Same author

Person-related selection bias in mobile sensing research: Robust findings from two panel studies.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same author

Dynamic networks of social contact, social desire, and affect across time scales.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.2K

Rapid computation of high-level visual surprise.

David Richter1,2, Paula Pena1, María Ruz1

  • 1Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Iscience
|December 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary

The brain predicts incoming sensory information, using surprise to guide perception. This study found that high-level visual features, not low-level ones, drive neural responses, suggesting abstract predictions facilitate perception.

Keywords:
Health sciences

More Related Videos

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

6.4K
Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

12.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.2K
Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

6.4K
Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

12.4K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Predictive processing theories posit the brain anticipates sensory input.
  • Sensory prediction errors, deviations from expectations, are crucial for perceptual inference.
  • Understanding which stimulus features the brain predicts remains a key question.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate which visual features (low-level vs. high-level) generate surprise that influences neural responses.
  • To determine if the brain predicts abstract or concrete stimulus properties.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized electroencephalography (EEG) to record brain activity.
  • Employed computational modeling with deep neural networks (DNNs) to quantify surprise.
  • Presented participants with probabilistically predicted object images.

Main Results:

  • Neural responses around 200 ms post-stimulus onset were significantly increased by high-level visual surprise.
  • Low-level visual surprise did not significantly affect these neural responses.
  • Surprise was quantified at both early (low-level) and late (high-level) DNN layers.

Conclusions:

  • The brain's predictive processing relies on high-level, abstract feature predictions.
  • These high-level predictions rapidly inform perceptual inference.
  • The predictive machinery is optimized for abstract expectations over low-level sensory details to enhance perception.