Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Ex Vivo Treatment Response of Primary Tumors and/or Associated Metastases for Preclinical and Clinical Development of Therapeutics
Published on: October 2, 2014
Targeting Hsp90 in Cancer for 25 Years: Failure of Previous Clinical Trials and New Hope for Future Therapeutics
Mei Chen1, Cheng Chang1, Kathleen L Miao1
1Department of Dermatology, The Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Abstract:
All previous IND (investigational new drug) applications to US FDA for launching clinical trials with Hsp90 ATP-binding inhibitors only provided a partial, if not misleading, account of the inhibitors' actual MOA (mechanism of action). Since 2004, studies have repeatedly shown a previously unanticipated "extra effect" of these inhibitors, but it has been incomprehensively ignored by the Hsp90 community. Membrane-impermeable, otherwise structurally identical, ATP-binding Hsp90 inhibitors show robust inhibition of tumor cell invasion in vitro and metastasis in vivo. Based on this new finding, the reported outcomes of around 90 monotherapy clinical trials with Hsp90 ATP-binding inhibitors since 1999 were actually a combined effect of targeting both intracellular Hsp90 chaperone and extracellular Hsp90 (eHsp90) non-chaperone functions by the inhibitors. A critical unanswered question remains: which form of the dual inhibitions caused the observed toxicity in humans that led to the spectacular failure of the trials and which underlies the limited efficacy that might be the real reason for the only approval of the orally administered ATP-binding inhibitor, Pimitespib (TAS-116), in 2022 by Japan? We suggest that addressing this question could prompt a paradigm shift in the design of next-generation anti-Hsp90 cancer therapeutics.
Insights
Hsp90 inhibitors target both intracellular and extracellular functions, impacting cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Understanding this dual mechanism is crucial for developing effective cancer therapeutics and explaining trial failures.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Drug Discovery
Background:
- Hsp90 ATP-binding inhibitors in clinical trials have not fully disclosed their mechanism of action (MOA).
- An "extra effect" of Hsp90 inhibitors, ignored since 2004, involves membrane-impermeable compounds inhibiting tumor cell invasion and metastasis.
- Structurally identical inhibitors demonstrate distinct activities based on membrane permeability, suggesting dual targeting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate the MOA of Hsp90 ATP-binding inhibitors in cancer therapy.
- To investigate the contribution of intracellular and extracellular Hsp90 inhibition to clinical trial outcomes.
- To identify the specific inhibitory function responsible for observed toxicity and limited efficacy in Hsp90 inhibitor trials.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of existing clinical trial data for Hsp90 ATP-binding inhibitors.
- Comparison of effects between membrane-permeable and membrane-impermeable Hsp90 inhibitors.
- In vitro and in vivo studies on tumor cell invasion and metastasis.
Main Results:
- Clinical trial outcomes of Hsp90 inhibitors are a combined effect of targeting intracellular Hsp90 chaperone and extracellular Hsp90 (eHsp90) non-chaperone functions.
- Membrane-impermeable inhibitors show significant inhibition of tumor cell invasion and metastasis.
- The dual inhibition mechanism may explain the toxicity and limited efficacy observed in numerous clinical trials.
Conclusions:
- The dual targeting of intracellular and extracellular Hsp90 by ATP-binding inhibitors is a critical factor in their therapeutic effects and toxicities.
- Clarifying the specific roles of intracellular and extracellular Hsp90 inhibition is essential for future drug design.
- Addressing this dual MOA could lead to a paradigm shift in developing next-generation Hsp90-targeted cancer therapeutics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...

