Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

07:51
A Novel Approach to Monitoring Graft Neovascularization in the Human Gingiva
Published on: January 12, 2019
7.1K
Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Intraoral (Palatal and Tuberosity) Soft Tissue Grafts in Root Coverage
Suha Alyawar1, Fatima Al Zahra1, Eman Aljoghaiman2
1Fellowship in Periodontics Program, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Division of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.
Dentistry Journal
|December 24, 2025
Summary
This systematic review compared palatal and tuberosity soft tissue grafts for root coverage. Tuberosity grafts may offer greater thickness and less discomfort, but more research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Periodontology
- Oral Surgery
- Regenerative Dentistry
Background:
- Root coverage surgeries aim to restore gum tissue around teeth.
- Soft tissue grafts are commonly used in mucogingival procedures.
- Palatal tissue is a traditional donor site, but alternatives are being explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes of palatal versus tuberosity soft tissue grafts.
- To assess graft dimensions, tissue thickness, and postoperative discomfort.
- To evaluate the available evidence on tuberosity as a donor site for root coverage.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was performed across major scientific databases (PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Medline, Scopus) until December 2023.
- Included studies were clinical trials and studies involving medically fit adults undergoing intraoral soft tissue grafting.
- Data extraction and risk of bias assessment (ROB 2, ROBINS-I) were conducted on 13 eligible studies.
Main Results:
- Tuberosity grafts generally exhibited greater thickness (2.9 ± 0.5 mm) compared to palatal grafts (2.3 ± 0.6 mm).
- Tuberosity grafts showed less volume change and one study reported decreased postoperative pain.
- Most studies had a low risk of bias, though some concerns were noted in randomized trials regarding blinding and allocation concealment.
Conclusions:
- The palate remains a reliable donor site for soft tissue grafts.
- Limited evidence suggests tuberosity grafts may offer advantages in thickness and patient comfort.
- Further standardized clinical trials with long-term follow-up are necessary to confirm the benefits of tuberosity grafts.

