Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
The Airway, Breathing, Circulation-Plan, Risk, Options (ABC-PRO) Handover Tool in the PICU: Retrospective Evaluation
Martina De Gaudenzi1, Rebeca Mozun1, Luregn J Schlapbach1,2
1Department of Intensive Care and Neonatology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Objectives:
Healthcare improvement studies indicate a potential to reduce cardiac arrests in the PICU through anticipatory care and shared awareness. We developed a structured risk-assessment and anticipation tool (i.e., the Airway, Breathing, Circulation-Plan, Risk, Options [ABC-PRO]) for PICU patient handover and assessed the impact on cardiac arrest occurrence rate.
Design:
Single-center, retrospective healthcare improvement audit of before- vs. after-ABC-PRO tool implementation.
Setting:
Multidisciplinary, 25-bed PICU of the University Children's Hospital, Zurich.
Patients:
Patients younger than 18 years admitted to the PICU (from January 2020 to September 2023) whose parents/guardians had not refused consent for general use of personal PICU administrative data.
Interventions:
We implemented the ABC-PRO handover tool and the primary outcome was the occurrence rate of cardiac arrests necessitating cardiopulmonary resuscitation, before vs. after the implementation. Cardiac arrest incidence was calculated per 1000 PICU-days using Poisson regressions, adjusted for age, sex, and Pediatric Index of Mortality.
Measurements And Main Results:
During 4,370 PICU admissions (21,804 PICU-days), there were 63 cardiac arrests in 59 patients. Of these, 43 occurred pre- (12,911 PICU-days), and eight post-implementation (6,156 PICU-days). The adjusted cardiac arrest occurrence rate pre- vs. post-implementation was 2.9 vs. 1.2 per 1000 PICU-days with an adjusted rate ratio (aRR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.88) overall, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.20-1.1) among cardiac, and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.14-1.6) among noncardiac patients. Cardiac arrests decreased most in cardiac surgical patients (aRR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.06-0.96]). However, we failed to identify a difference in cardiac arrest mortality pre- vs. post-implementation (17/41 vs. 1/8; mean percentage difference, 29%; 95% CI, 2-56%; p = 0.12).
Conclusions:
The ABC-PRO PICU handover tool provides a structured approach to risk-assessment and anticipation and may be associated with a decreased cardiac arrest occurrence rate in the PICU, with effects most pronounced in cardiac surgical patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:

