Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

9.3K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
9.3K
Structural Classification of Joints01:20

Structural Classification of Joints

6.8K
Joints, also known as articulations, are classified based on their structural characteristics, i.e., based on whether the articulating surfaces of the adjacent bones are directly connected by fibrous connective tissue or cartilage, or whether the articulating surfaces contact each other within a fluid-filled joint cavity. These differences serve to divide the joints of the body into three structural classifications.
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
6.8K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.8K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.8K
Functional Classification of Joints01:09

Functional Classification of Joints

6.5K
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses  or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
6.5K
Tagging and Fusion Proteins01:24

Tagging and Fusion Proteins

8.3K
Proteins are involved in several cellular processes and biochemical reactions. Analyzing a specific protein of interest requires it to be isolated from the other proteins in the cell. This is achieved by overexpressing the specific gene in a suitable host to produce large quantities of the target protein. A tag or label is recombined with the gene to produce a fusion protein containing the target protein and the tag. The tags on these fusion proteins can then be used for easy detection and...
8.3K
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

43.4K
Overview
43.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial polarization phase shift keying for high-capacity coherent free-space optical communication.

Optics express·2025
Same author

Performance analysis of the optimized equilibrium optimizer algorithm using linear population size reduction in the coherent free-space optical communication system.

Optics express·2025
Same author

Homodyne detection efficiency analysis of coherent lidar based on a hybrid algorithm.

Applied optics·2025
Same author

Performance analysis of free space optical communications with FOA-WFS.

Optics express·2024
Same author

Application of AdamSPGD algorithm to sensor-less adaptive optics in coherent free-space optical communication system.

Optics express·2022
Same author

Inhibition of complement pathway activation with Pozelimab, a fully human antibody to complement component C5.

PloS one·2020
Same journal

Research on a Regional Availability Evaluation Model for Road-Area High-Entropy Energy Based on Synergy Factors.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Atmospheric Turbulence Channel Modeling and Performance Analysis of a CO-ZP-OFDM Coherent Optical Communication System for UAV Air-to-Ground Scenarios.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Information Geometry and Asymptotic Theory for SMML Estimators.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Correlation Entropy and Power-Law Kinetics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Research on the Contagion of Systemic Financial Risk Under the Impact of Climate Risks-From the Perspective of Complex Networks and Machine Learning.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Statistical-Mechanical Meaning of the Wave Function of Quantum Mechanics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Oncogenic Gene Fusion Detection Using Anchored Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Followed by Next Generation Sequencing
09:49

Oncogenic Gene Fusion Detection Using Anchored Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Followed by Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: July 5, 2019

9.9K

Fusing Semantic and Structural Features for Code Error Detection.

Yiwen Zhang1, Wei Liu2, Fazhong Jiang3

  • 1National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for code error detection but struggle with structural dependencies. A new hybrid model combining RoBERTa and Graph Neural Networks improves accuracy for common programming faults.

Keywords:
code error detectiongraph neural networkslarge language models

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Oncogenic Gene Fusion Detection Using Anchored Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Followed by Next Generation Sequencing
09:49

Oncogenic Gene Fusion Detection Using Anchored Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Followed by Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: July 5, 2019

9.9K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Software Engineering

Background:

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) based on the Transformer architecture excel at processing sequential data, showing potential for automated code error detection.
  • However, current LLMs exhibit limitations in effectively handling structural code dependencies, hindering their performance in code analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel hybrid model that integrates semantic understanding from RoBERTa with the structural learning capabilities of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs).
  • To enhance the accuracy and robustness of automated code error detection, specifically targeting common programming faults like runtime, index, and import/module errors.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a hybrid model combining RoBERTa for semantic analysis and GNNs for structural dependency learning.
  • Implementation of a fusion technique to effectively integrate the outputs of both components.
  • Experimental evaluation comparing the hybrid model against baseline models on code error detection tasks.

Main Results:

  • The proposed hybrid model demonstrates superior performance compared to existing models in detecting programming faults.
  • Experimental evaluation shows significant improvements in accuracy and robustness.
  • The model achieved a 1.75% increase in test accuracy over competitive baselines.

Conclusions:

  • The integration of semantic and structural learning through a hybrid RoBERTa-GNN model effectively addresses the limitations of traditional LLMs in code error detection.
  • The developed fusion technique is crucial for the model's enhanced performance.
  • This approach offers a more robust and accurate solution for identifying common programming errors, advancing automated software quality assurance.