Development of a MassARRAY Genotyping Platform and Its Clinical Application for Venous Thromboembolism Risk

Dollapak Apipongrat1,2, Chonlada Laoruangroj2, Oytip Nathalang3

  • 1Department of Pathology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.

PubMed

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a multifactorial disorder influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, with substantial variability in susceptibility across populations. Data on VTE-associated genetic variants in Asian populations, including Thais, remain limited. To address this, we developed a 39-single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping panel using the MassARRAY platform and evaluated its association with VTE in a Thai cohort. Methods: A total of 209 individuals, comprising 122 patients with objectively confirmed VTE and 87 age- and sex-matched healthy controls, were genotyped. Allele frequencies were compared, and associations with VTE were assessed. Results: Seven SNPs demonstrated significant associations: five risk alleles (PROC rs146922325, ABO rs8176743, FGG rs2066865, F11 rs4253417, and HIVEP1 rs169713) and two protective alleles (F5 rs4524 and TGFB2 rs57615042). To examine cumulative effects, a polygenic risk score (PRS) integrating genetic and clinical factors was constructed. Higher PRS was significantly associated with recurrence, particularly among patients with unprovoked VTE, conferring more than a threefold increase in recurrence risk (HR = 3.53, 95% CI: 1.04-10.2, p = 0.043). These findings provide the first systematic evidence of population-specific genetic risk factors for VTE in Thais and highlight the clinical potential of PRS for recurrence prediction. Conclusions: The MassARRAY-based panel offers a cost-effective, high-throughput strategy for simultaneous SNP detection, supporting scalable genomic studies and personalized risk stratification. Our results contribute to understanding the genetic architecture of VTE and highlight the value of incorporating non-European populations into genetic studies to advance precision medicine.

Related Concept Videos

Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:20

Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

The key difference between Superficial Vein Thrombosis (SVT) and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) lies in their location and severity.Clinical ManifestationsSVT typically presents with localized pain, tenderness, and redness along the course of a superficial vein, often accompanied by a palpable, cord-like structure under the skin. This condition is usually less dangerous than DVT but can be uncomfortable and may lead to complications such as cellulitis or, rarely, a clot extension into the deep...
266
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care01:29

Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

Venous thrombosis requires effective prevention and treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes and reduce potential complications.Prevention StrategiesHealthcare providers must prioritize preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) for all adult patients upon admission. Interventions depend on bleeding and thrombosis risk, medical history, current medications, diagnoses, planned procedures, and patient preferences. Patients on bed rest should change positions every two hours and, if not...
257
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction01:30

Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction

Venous thrombosis, the most common disorder of the veins, involves the formation of a thrombus or blood clot associated with vein inflammation. It can be classified as either superficial vein thrombosis or deep vein thrombosis.Superficial Vein Thrombosis: This involves the formation of a thrombus in a superficial vein, usually the greater or lesser saphenous vein. Though less severe than deep vein thrombosis (DVT), SVT can lead to complications if untreated.Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT): This...
267