Incidence of Post-Procedural Conduction Disturbances and Rates of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Older and Newer...

Objective: This analysis compares new (G2) versus old (G1) generations of transcatheter heart valves (THVs) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures, focusing on key outcomes: post-procedural conduction disturbance (CD) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI). We aim to determine whether G2 valves reduce these specific complications and thereby improve patient outcomes compared with G1. Methods: From February 2015 to September 2022, 1468 patients underwent TAVR at the university clinic in Kiel. After applying exclusion criteria, a final cohort of 1182 patients were analysed. Among these, 782 patients underwent TAVR with G1, whereas 400 underwent TAVR with G2. The primary study endpoints were the occurrence of new CD and PPMI within 30 days post-procedure. The secondary endpoints included diverse post-TAVR events as defined by the safety criteria of Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC III). A statistical analysis compared outcomes between the G1 and G2 groups. Results: Out of 1182 patients, 12.1% required PPMI within 30 days. Rates showed no statistical difference between G2 and G1 for PPMI (10.3% vs. 13.0%, IPTW-weighted p = 0.31) or CD (15.3% vs. 21.48%, IPTW-weighted p = 0.08). Among G2, the Sapien 3 Ultra valve had the lowest PPMI rate (4.8%). Overall, G2 and G1 had similar post-procedural and 30-day mortality rates. Conclusion: G2 valves may reduce post-procedure CD, but the difference is not statistically significant. Differences between specific valve types-such as the Sapien 3 Ultra's lower rates-are notable, but overall, PPMI and safety profiles remain similar between G1 and G2. Patient and procedural factors still play a significant role. Careful valve and patient selection is essential, and ongoing research will guide further improvements.