Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
Personalized Acute Upper GI Bleeding Diagnostics for Patients at Highest Risk for Endoscopy: Real-World Experience of
Hadi Khaled Abou Zeid1, Manik Aggarwal1, Jad P AbiMansour1
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
Abstract:
Background: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common medical emergency associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Many patients undergo early endoscopy despite the absence of active bleeding. PillSense is a novel Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared ingestible capsule that rapidly detects the presence of blood in the upper GI tract and may optimize triage decisions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study evaluating the impact of PillSense on the management of suspected UGIB in an academic center. The primary outcome was the association between capsule results and clinical decision-making, including endoscopy deferral, prioritization, outpatient scheduling, and airway protection. Secondary outcomes included transfusion requirements, time-to-endoscopy, endoscopic intervention, and 30-day adverse events. Results: A total of 28 patients (mean age 64.4 ± 17.9 years, 82.7% male) were included. Compared with negative results, positive results were associated with higher transfusion requirements (median 3 (IQR 3-6) vs. 2 (IQR 1-3.25) units; p = 0.041) and shorter time-to-endoscopy (median 0.2 (IQR 0.01-1) vs. 2 (IQR 1-15.5) days; p = 0.017). In high-risk for sedated endoscopy patients, negative results were associated with EGD deferral in 53.8%, with no subsequent adverse events within 30 days. Endoscopic intervention was performed in 62.5% of positive-result patients versus 9.5% of negative-result patients. Conclusions: The PillSense results were associated with differences in triage and management of high-risk patients with suspected UGIB. Its rapid, accurate, and non-invasive results may reduce unnecessary urgent endoscopy procedures, improve resource utilization, and enhance patient safety, particularly in the highest-risk populations.
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
What is Monogastric Digestion?

