Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Plus Nutritional Counseling Attenuates Thigh Muscle Thickness Loss in...

This study aimed to determine whether neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with nutritional counseling promotes an increase in thigh muscle thickness (MT), as well as to assess changes in the relationship between MT and intracellular water (ICW). Body composition methods such as ultrasound may overestimate muscle mass, depending on the context, because they cannot distinguish the contractile protein component from body fluids, including intra- and extracellular water.

A pilot randomized parallel trial was conducted with 25 hospitalized patients with unselected cancer, who were divided into two groups: NMES + Diet and Diet. Both groups received nutritional counseling, but only one group received NMES. NMES was applied bilaterally to the origin and insertion points of the quadriceps twice daily, with a 3 h interval between sessions, for 7 consecutive days. MT and ICW were measured before and after the intervention. Food consumption was assessed using a 24 h dietary recall at baseline and at the end of the study to quantify and adjust macronutrient intake during the intervention.

Both treatment groups (Diet × NMES + Diet) showed similar dropout rates which means participants in the more intensive treatment did not quit more frequently, once intervention with NMES was feasible and well tolerated. In addition, both groups showed a reduction in carbohydrate intake (p = 0.012) and an increase in leucine intake (p < 0.001) post-intervention. The increase in leucine intake was significantly greater in the NMES + Diet group (p < 0.001), and the reduction in carbohydrate intake was also greater in this group (p = 0.012). In the delta analysis, the NMES + Diet group showed an increase in thigh MT, whereas the Diet group experienced a decrease (Diet group: ∆ = -2.53 ± 3.73 mm vs. NMES + Diet group: ∆ = 2.09 ± 2.27 mm, p = 0.001). Moreover, the MT/ICW ratio was higher in the NMES + Diet group post-intervention (Diet group: ∆ = -0.15 ± 0.19 mm/L vs. NMES + Diet group: ∆ = 0.11 ± 0.09 mm/L, p < 0.001), while no significant difference in ICW was observed between groups.

short-term intervention combining nutritional counseling with NMES increased thigh MT and the MT/ICW ratio, possibly due to NMES-induced extracellular water expansion.