Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Should We Replace the Non-Aneurysmal Aortic Arch During Elective Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Marfan
Malakh Shrestha1,2, Tim Kaufeld2, Linda Rudolph2
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Unites States.
Background:
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement has increasingly been performed in Marfan patients. However, there is ongoing debate on whether the non-aneurysmal sized aortic arch should be prophylactically replaced during the index operation. The aim of our retrospective single-centre study was to investigate the long-term status of the aortic arch in these patients.
Methods:
Between 1993 and 2021, a total of 723 patients underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement with a straight tube graft (David I reimplantation) at our institution; 119 patients had confirmed Marfan disease. Of these 119 Marfan patients, 67 patients had isolated aortic root aneurysm with no aortic arch pathology. These 67 patients underwent isolated David I procedure in an elective setting (only aortic root and ascending aortic replacement) without any concomitant procedures and were included in the present study.
Results:
This study includes 67 patients with Marfan syndrome who underwent isolated elective valve-sparing aortic root replacement. The median age of patients was 30 years (20-41), and 47 were male (70%). The cardiopulmonary time was 157.5 (145.8-178.3) min, and aortic clamp time was 117.0 ± 19.8 min. The in-hospital mortality and stroke rates were both 0%. Follow-up was 100% complete. Survival at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 100%, 100%, 93%, 89%, and 85%, respectively. Freedom from aortic arch reoperation due to aneurysm at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, and 95%, respectively. In follow-up, no patient required aortic arch replacement due to aortic arch aneurysm. A total of 3 patients underwent aortic arch replacement for type B aortic dissection. Of these 3 patients, 1 had chronic type B dissection with aortic aneurysm, and 2 had acute type B dissection.
Conclusions:
The long-term results after valve-sparing aortic root replacement with a straight tube graft (David I procedure) in Marfan patients are excellent. Our study shows that the risk for future aortic arch intervention after elective valve sparing aortic root replacement in Marfan patients is extremely low. Hence, our study supports the idea that concomitant prophylactic aortic arch replacement during elective valve sparing aortic root replacement in Marfan patients with non-aneurysmal aortic arch is not necessary.
Insights
For Marfan patients undergoing valve-sparing aortic root replacement, prophylactic aortic arch replacement is not necessary. Long-term follow-up shows a very low risk of future aortic arch intervention, supporting isolated aortic root repair.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Genetics
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) is increasingly used for Marfan syndrome.
- Debate exists on whether to prophylactically replace the non-aneurysmal aortic arch during VSARR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term status of the aortic arch in Marfan patients after isolated VSARR.
- To determine the necessity of concomitant prophylactic aortic arch replacement.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 67 Marfan patients who underwent isolated David I procedure (VSARR) between 1993 and 2021.
- Exclusion of patients with aortic arch pathology at the time of surgery.
- 100% complete follow-up to assess aortic arch status and reoperation rates.
Main Results:
- Excellent survival rates at 20 years (85%).
- High freedom from aortic arch reoperation due to aneurysm (95% at 20 years).
- No patient required aortic arch replacement for aneurysm; 3 underwent replacement for type B aortic dissection.
Conclusions:
- Isolated VSARR in Marfan patients yields excellent long-term outcomes.
- The risk of future aortic arch intervention after isolated VSARR is very low.
- Prophylactic aortic arch replacement is not indicated in Marfan patients with non-aneurysmal aortic arches undergoing elective VSARR.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

