Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Mouse Footpad Inoculation Model to Study Viral-Induced Neuroinflammatory Responses
Published on: June 14, 2020
Basic Science and Pathogenesis
Karen Nuytemans1,2, Liyong Wang1,3, Luciana Bertholim Nasciben2
1Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Background:
The identification of susceptibility genes in noncoding genome-wide association study (GWAS) loci remains a challenge as interactions between regulatory elements and targets can span several Mb and exceed 1:1 ratio of element-to-target. For several noncoding AD GWAS loci, the variant(s) and gene target(s) likely to be driving the association have been difficult to determine, with multiple or no clear candidate genes. To identify underlying susceptibility gene(s) in these "ambiguous" loci, we queried an in-house high-resolution Hi-C database of genomic interactions in multiple genomic ancestries.
Method:
Hi-C libraries were constructed using brain frontal cortex and iPSC-derived AD relevant cells from donors matched for age, sex, and APOE genotype. We used Enhanced Hi-C Capture analyses (eHiCA), incorporating the DeepLoop pipeline with 5kb resolution and 5kb bait windows surrounding the top GWAS and LD variants, to map chromatin loops using Hi-C data. In our initial analyses, we applied eHiCA to uncover the regulatory architecture in six ambiguous loci from the Bellenguez et al GWAS in non-Hispanic whites (NHW).
Result:
In the PICALM/EED locus, we found PICALM as the susceptibility gene with the strongest evidence, though lower-level interaction with the EED promoter and regions surrounding GWAS LD variants were also observed. Interestingly, in the USP6NL/ECHDC3 and BCKDK/KAT8 loci, multiple candidate genes other than the closest genes to the LD variants were looped to the GWAS LD variants, including CELF2 and SETD1A, respectively. For two other loci (EPDR1/NME8 and MINDY2/ADAM10), the most likely candidates were the gene after which each locus was named (NME8 and ADAM10), with evidence supporting GWAS variants located in promoter or enhancer sites looping back to those genes. Interactions observed in the UNC5CL/TREM2 locus did not identify TREM2 or any other gene promoter as a likely target but showed interaction with an enhancer supporting potential indirect effects.
Conclusion:
This initial application of eHiCA on ambiguous AD GWAS loci demonstrates the utility of chromatin regulatory maps in nominating candidate genes of GWAS hits in non-coding loci which lack clear candidates. This extended application of eHiCA will broaden our understanding of AD genomics overall.
Related Concept Videos
Infection
The chain begins with pathogens: bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, or parasites such as protozoa helminths. These can be present on the skin as transient or resident flora, or they can be acquired from the environment. Identifying and treating the type of infection and...
Urinary Tract Infection II: Pathophysiology
Cystic Fibrosis: Pathogenesis
CF is primarily caused by a genetic mutation in a chromosome 7 gene coding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The most common gene mutation leading to CF is the ΔF508 mutation,...
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology
Stages of Infection
Defense Against Bacterial Pathogens
Phagocytes
Phagocytes are the frontline soldiers of the immune system. They include neutrophils and macrophages. Neutrophils are the most abundant type of white blood cell and are quickly mobilized to the site of infection. Macrophages are larger cells that patrol...

