Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Clinical Manifestations
Sterre C M de Boer1, Chiara Fenoglio2,3, Andrea Arighi4
1Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Background:
Sex-linked differences in sporadic behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (s-bvFTD) are increasingly recognized. Research suggests that females with bvFTD exhibit greater atrophy in affected brain regions than males, despite similar clinical severity. Given that brain atrophy correlates with elevated markers of neurodegeneration, such as neurofilament light (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), we hypothesized that these biomarkers differ between sexes.
Method:
Serum NfL and GFAP levels were measured using Simoa in 357 participants (275 with s-bvFTD, 82 with primary psychiatric disorders (PPD)). Biomarker levels were compared between sexes, followed by linear regression analyses stratified by diagnostic group. In a subset of s-bvFTD participants (47 females, 105 males) with available Z-scored cognitive composite scores (including global cognition, executive function, attention and working memory), we performed linear regression using a residuals approach (with age at blood sample (AAS), education, and Z-scored NfL or GFAP as predictor) to assess cognitive reserve.
Result:
Females with s-bvFTD had significantly higher NfL and GFAP levels than males (both p <0.05), whereas no sex differences were observed in the PPD group. Within s-bvFTD, higher AAS (β=0.015, 95% CI [0.006-0.023]) and female sex (β=0.223, 95% CI [0.071-0.375]) were associated with higher logNfL. In PPD, higher AAS (β=0.030, 95% CI [0.019-0.042]) correlated with higher logNfL, but no sex effect was observed (β=-0.092, 95% CI [-0.265-0.082]). For GFAP, higher AAS (β=0.030, 95% CI [0.023-0.037]) and female sex (β=0.305, 95% CI [0.183-0.427]) were associated with higher logGFAP in s-bvFTD. In PPD, only AAS (β=0.026, 95% CI [0.012-0.040]) was significant, without a sex effect (β=0.033, 95% CI [-0.177-0.243]). Composite scores were lower in females (female=-0.24 vs. male=0.003), though not significantly (p >0.05). Residuals of linear regression did not differ by sex for both GFAP and NfL (p >0.05). However, NfL (but not GFAP) predicted a steeper cognitive decline in males (β=-0.15, p <0.05) than in females (β=-0.12, p >0.05).
Conclusion:
Females with s-bvFTD exhibited significantly higher NfL and GFAP levels. This sex difference is not explained by differences in cognitive reserve. Given that NfL plateaus as disease progresses, these findings suggest that females with s-bvFTD may present at a more advanced disease stage upon clinical presentation.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

