Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Comparison of International Expert Working Group Algorithms for Diagnosing Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary
Christopher C Y Wong1, Vedant S Pargaonkar2, Luke P Dawson2
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, California, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Insights
The Microvascular Network (MVN) algorithm offers a higher diagnostic yield for angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) endotypes than the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) algorithm. Testing for myocardial bridging and endothelial dysfunction is recommended for suspected ANOCA.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Coronary function testing (CFT) protocols for angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) vary among expert groups.
- The European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) focuses on spasm and microvascular dysfunction.
- The Microvascular Network (MVN) includes myocardial bridging and endothelial dysfunction assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic yield of EAPCI and MVN algorithms in ANOCA patients.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of different diagnostic strategies for ANOCA.
Main Methods:
- Utilized fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, intravascular ultrasound, and acetylcholine provocation.
- Assessed myocardial bridging in patients with suspected ANOCA.
Main Results:
- The MVN algorithm identified ANOCA in 88.2% of patients, versus 53.5% with EAPCI (P < 0.001).
- MVN reclassified 66.7% of EAPCI's noncardiac chest pain patients and 84.3% of EAPCI's obstructive coronary artery disease patients into ANOCA endotypes.
- Patients classified with cardiac chest pain by MVN had significantly lower Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores.
Conclusions:
- The MVN algorithm demonstrates a superior diagnostic yield for ANOCA endotypes compared to the EAPCI algorithm.
- Routine assessment for myocardial bridging and endothelial dysfunction is advised in suspected ANOCA cases.
Background:
Coronary function testing (CFT) protocols in patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) differ among expert working groups. The European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorses testing for coronary artery spasm and microvascular dysfunction, while the Microvascular Network (MVN) recommends additional assessment for myocardial bridging and endothelial dysfunction.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield between the EAPCI and MVN algorithms in a large cohort of patients with ANOCA.
Methods:
Fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, intravascular ultrasound, acetylcholine provocation, and myocardial bridging assessment were performed in patients referred for clinically suspected ANOCA.
Results:
Among 516 patients, the prevalence of ANOCA, obstructive coronary artery disease, and noncardiac chest pain was 53.5%, 20.9%, and 25.6%, respectively, according to the EAPCI algorithm, compared with 88.2%, 3.3%, and 8.5% according to the MVN algorithm (P < 0.001 for overall difference). Of 132 patients classified as noncardiac chest pain by the EAPCI algorithm, 66.7% were reclassified into an ANOCA endotype using the MVN algorithm. Similarly, 84.3% of 108 patients diagnosed with obstructive coronary artery disease using the EAPCI algorithm were reclassified into an ANOCA endotype by the MVN algorithm. The mean Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score was significantly lower in patients with cardiac chest pain compared with those with noncardiac chest pain (51.0 vs 56.1; P = 0.030) as defined by the MVN algorithm.
Conclusions:
The MVN algorithm results in a higher diagnostic yield for ANOCA endotypes compared with the EAPCI algorithm. Routine testing for myocardial bridging and endothelial dysfunction should be considered in patients with suspected ANOCA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina II: Classification
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina I: Introduction

