Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Clinical Manifestations
Anika Bhatia1, Veena Namboodiri1, Noor Malhi1
1The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.
Background:
(1) Investigate the effects of age [Younger (YA) vs. Older (OA) Adults] and framing (Risk of Loss vs. Reward) on a cognitive effort-based decision-making task (CEDT) in which participants can choose to expend greater effort (i.e., working memory) to maximize their earnings, and (2) Examine the construct validity of this task in relation to self-report symptom inventories. Based on the developmental course of cognitive control systems and the Socioemotional Selectivity Theory of Aging, we hypothesized that (1) YAs would choose to expend more effort [DV=Hard Task Selection Frequency (HTSF)] in pursuit of rewards, (2) OAs would choose to expend more effort to avoid loss, and (3) lower effort expenditure (HTSF) would be more strongly related to self-reported symptoms of amotivation than mood.
Method:
Ninety-seven (YA=52, OA=45) cognitively normal adults completed the CEDT and questionnaires assessing mood (PANAS: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule) and motivation (DAS: Dimensional Apathy Scale).
Result:
Overall, YAs exhibited greater effort expenditure (HTSF: YA=59%, OA=49%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). On risk trials, YAs had significantly faster decision reaction times (DRT: p <0.001), but did not differ significantly from OAs in accuracy (YA=51%, OA=51%) or effort expenditure (HTSF: YA=42%, OA=45%; Eta2<0.01). On reward trials, all between-group comparisons were statistically significant (p <0.001), with YAs making faster decisions (DRT: Eta2 = 0.13), exhibiting greater effort (HTSF: YA=77%, OA=52%; Eta2 = 0.14), and maintaining a higher accuracy rate (YA=76%, OA=56%; Eta2 = 0.14) than their OA counterparts. Effort expenditure on risk trials was not significantly correlated with self-report measures, while greater effort expenditure on reward trials was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) correlated with lower positive affect (R2 = 0.10), higher negative affect (R2 = 0.07), and greater executive apathy (R2 = 0.09).
Conclusion:
Obtained findings were partially consistent with our hypotheses as both age groups exhibited greater cognitive effort in pursuit of rewards and risk aversion was only slightly higher in OAs vs. YAs, while greater effort expenditure (on reward trials only) was counterintuitively related to greater self-reported symptoms of mental effort avoidance and mood. While the concept of decisional inertia may help to contextualize our findings, such potential confounds will need to be explored in our future work.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

