Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Clinical Manifestations
Sabela C Mallo1, Camilla Elefante2, Eulogio Real-Deus3
1Instituto de Psicoloxía (IPsiUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
Background:
The Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C) is a 34-question tool that assess neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in individuals at risk of dementia. However, its foundational structure is still not well understood. Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) has some advantages that make it appropriate to analyze MBI-C's structure:(1) provides orthogonal, normalized dimensions to explain items relationships; (2) is iterative, not analytic, requiring no prior assumptions about the data; (3) offers simpler solutions with fewer dimensions for a good fit. Thus, we aimed to analyze the underlying structure of the MBI-C at baseline by using MDS in a sample of MBI participants from the CompAS and the Pisa cohort studies.
Method:
Participants from the CompAS and Pisa studies were recruited, respectively, at primary care health centers and psychogeriatric outpatient service. Pre-dementia participants from the Pisa and the CompAS studies completed the MBI-C and only those with met the MBI diagnosis criteria were considered (Pisa=55; CompAS=24). Regarding the MDS analyses, a two-step bidimensional weighted dichotomous MDS was performed.
Results:
Study comparisons showed only significant age differences, being the participants from the Pisa study older than those from the CompAS. No significant differences were found in the other variables (see Table 1). The MDS analyses showed optimal fit indices (stress-II = .25; D.A.F. = .98). Figure 1 shows the coordinates for the MBI-C items in the bidimensional solution. Dimension I (horizontal) differentiate between internalizing vs externalizing symptoms. Dimension II (vertical) distinguishes between behavioral-goal directed dyscontrol vs emotional dysregulation. Thus, these quadrants indicate symptoms of Covert-Goal directed dysregulation (I, top left); Overt-Goal directed dyscontrol (II, top right); Overt-emotional dyscontrol (III, bottom right); and Covert-emotional dysregulation (IV, bottom left).
Conclusion:
Results suggest two main criteria underline NPS included in the original scale: internalizing vs externalizing symptoms and behavioral-goal directed dyscontrol vs emotional dysregulation. These two criteria seem to differentiate between four NPS states (Covert-Goal directed dysregulation, Overt-Goal directed dyscontrol, Overt-emotional dyscontrol, and Covert-emotional dysregulation), which could be useful in the determination of risk factors for predementia participants.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

