Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Unrealistic Optimism Bias01:30

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

187
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
187
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.9K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fine-mapping candidate neuropsychiatric regulatory variants using cell type-aware comparative genomics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Neural correlates of combinatorial reasoning in prefrontal cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A Multimodal Atlas Reveals the Anatomical Distribution of Medium Spiny Neuron Subtypes and a Novel RGS6+ Population in the Primate Striatum.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Challenges in Predicting Chromatin Accessibility Differences between Species.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Combining Machine Learning and Multiplexed, <i>In Situ</i> Profiling to Engineer Cell Type and Behavioral Specificity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Uncovering synaptic and cellular nanoarchitecture of brain tissue via seamless <i>in situ</i> trimming and milling for cryo-electron tomography.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.4K

Rhesus macaque choices reveal that ambiguity aversion is driven by pessimistic probability estimates.

Willa G Kerkhoff1,2, William R Stauffer1,2

  • 1Center for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|December 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision-makers exhibit ambiguity aversion, preferring known risks over unknown probabilities. This study reveals inconsistent probability judgments in nonhuman primates, impacting economic decision-making.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.0K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.4K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.0K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Economic uncertainty manifests as risk (known probabilities) and ambiguity (unknown probabilities).
  • Ambiguity aversion, the preference for risk over ambiguity, is common but its underlying mechanisms are poorly understood.
  • Nonhuman primate models offer a controlled environment to investigate decision-making under uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the psychological and neural mechanisms driving ambiguity aversion.
  • To develop and validate a nonhuman primate task for studying attitudes towards ambiguity.
  • To explore how subjective probability judgments are affected by the magnitude of potential outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A novel nonhuman primate task was designed to assess choices between risky and ambiguous gambles.
  • Behavioral data were collected to quantify ambiguity aversion.
  • Subjective equivalence points between risky and ambiguous options were analyzed to understand probability misperceptions.

Main Results:

  • Nonhuman primates demonstrated strong ambiguity aversion, persisting even with opportunities for learning.
  • Large potential outcomes led to underestimation of probabilities for favorable ambiguous options.
  • Small potential outcomes resulted in overestimation of probabilities for favorable ambiguous options.
  • Inconsistent probability judgments were observed, suggesting a lack of stable belief systems.

Conclusions:

  • Ambiguity aversion in primates is robust and influenced by outcome magnitude.
  • Inconsistent subjective probability judgments contribute to suboptimal economic decision-making.
  • This research provides a foundation for exploring the neurophysiological basis of ambiguity aversion and economic choices.