Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Status epilepticus: the score question.

Francesco Misirocchi1, Pia De Stefano2,3

  • 1Unit of Neurology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma (AOSP), Parma, Italy.

Frontiers in Neurology
|December 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rhythmic and Periodic Patterns and Seizures in Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.

Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society·2026
Same author

Treatment adequacy outweighs treatment sequence in non-convulsive status epilepticus.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

Anesthetics in status epilepticus: does one size fits it all?-A scoping review on titration goals, timing, and patient selection.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same author

EEG-based machine-learning prognostication in comatose patients with indeterminate outcome after cardiac arrest.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same author

Rethinking the classification of acute status epilepticus: structural brain vs. systemic etiologies.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same author

Liver transplant and impact on cerebral autoregulation: a systematic scoping review.

Frontiers in transplantation·2026
Same journal

Mind the gender gap: how defining head trauma increases reporting in women aged 30-50.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same journal

Traditional Chinese medicine interventions for post-stroke cognitive impairment: an evidence mapping.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same journal

Acupuncture is independently associated with improved recovery in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a prospective observational study.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same journal

A convergence of global epidemics: diabetes as a modulator of neurodegenerative and neuro-inflammatory disorders.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same journal

Lumbar puncture opening pressure, brain network hub integrity, and delirium in herpes simplex virus encephalitis: a prospective cohort study.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same journal

Sleep deprivation: a comprehensive review of multisystem impacts, underlying mechanisms, and emerging interventions.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
See all related articles

Status epilepticus (SE) is a serious neurological emergency. Current prognostic scores for SE have limited predictive power and clinical use, necessitating improved models for better patient management.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Clinical Prognostics

Background:

  • Status epilepticus (SE) presents a significant neurological emergency with substantial morbidity and mortality.
  • Existing prognostic scores for SE primarily assess short-term mortality, with STESS and EMSE being the most validated.
  • Recent models attempt to predict functional outcomes, long-term survival, and epilepsy recurrence, yet face limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current landscape of prognostic scores for status epilepticus (SE).
  • To identify the limitations of existing SE prognostic tools.
  • To outline future directions for developing more clinically applicable SE prediction models.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of prognostic scores for status epilepticus.
Keywords:
artificial intelligenceoutcome assessmentprognostic modelsrisk predictionstatus epilepticus

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the validation, applicability, and limitations of current SE prediction tools.
  • Discussion of emerging AI-based approaches and future model development requirements.

    • Main Results:

    • Current SE prognostic scores exhibit limited predictive performance due to subjective variables and lack of universal cut-offs.
    • Clinical integration of existing scores is minimal, primarily used for research.
    • AI-based SE prediction models show promise but face challenges in clinical applicability.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing prognostic scores for SE are insufficient for guiding individualized clinical management.
    • Future SE models must balance accuracy with feasibility and integrate data across the care continuum.
    • Standardized SE definitions and management are crucial for the development of clinically valuable prognostic tools.