Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies
Published on: January 28, 2014
Biomarkers
Arno Liseune1, Ricardo Magalhães1, Simon Van Eyndhoven1
1Icometrix, Leuven, Belgium.
Background:
Amyloid beta-directed monoclonal antibody therapies may cause ARIA-E (edema) and ARIA-H (microhemorrhage (MH) and superficial siderosis (SS)). Studies have shown that clinicians find it challenging to identify or evaluate ARIA. As treatment decisions are informed by ARIA presence and severity, assistive automated detection and severity grading software may significantly improve radiological reading.
Method:
ICObrain aria is the first FDA-cleared CADe/CADx software for automated detection and severity grading of ARIA-E and ARIA-H. Sixteen non-ARIA-expert radiologists evaluated ARIA in 199 cases of Alzheimer's disease patients treated with aducanumab. They read the cases twice, i.e., assisted and unassisted by icobrain aria. Ground truth ARIA severity was established by three expert neuroradiologists for ARIA-E, ARIA-H MH and ARIA-H SS and was compared between the standalone software and experts, and between (un)assisted radiologists and experts using the Obuchowski agreement metric.
Result:
The ARIA severity grading suggested automatically by the software in the sample of 199 cases was interchangeable with experts, meaning that its agreement to experts was at the same level as inter-expert agreement. Indeed, the Obuchowski agreement metric between the 3 experts was 0.878 [CI: 0.828, 0.927] for ARIA-E, 0.821 [CI: 0.773, 0.868] for ARIA-H MH and 0.771 [CI: 0.721, 0.806] for ARIA-H SS, while icobrain aria's was 0.853 [CI: 0.816, 0.889] for ARIA-E, 0.805 [CI: 0.769, 0.839] for ARIA-H MH and 0.745 [0.7, 0.792] for ARIA-H SS. See Figure 1 top. The interchangeability of non-expert radiologists with experts increased significantly (Wilcoxon test p-value<0.05) from 0.78 ± 0.05, 0.75 ± 0.07, 0.66 ± 0.07 for the unassisted readers to 0.83 ± 0.05, 0.78 ± 0.06, 0.72 ± 0.05 for the assisted readers for ARIA-E, ARIA-H MH and ARIA-H SS, respectively (Figure 1 bottom).
Conclusion:
The standalone software icobrain aria grades ARIA severity closer to experts than unassisted radiologists do, but when using the software as an assistive tool, radiologists grade ARIA severity more interchangeably with experts.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...

