Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Clinical Manifestations
Minji Song1,2, Ashita S Gurnani1,2, Katherine Gifford1,2
1Framingham Heart Study, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Background:
Cognitive functioning is influenced by demographic factors, and this relationship is further impacted by cultural differences. This study aimed to compare the effects of demographic factors on cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults in the U.S. and Korea, providing insights into potential cultural influences.
Method:
A total of 1,229 individuals from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) and 2,781 individuals from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study-Cardiovascular Disease Association Study-Cognitive Aging (KoGES-CAVAS-CA) were included (Figure 1, Table 1). The most recent neuropsychological tests of dementia-free participants in each study were grouped into four cognitive domains: Memory, Language, Visuospatial Function (VF), and Attention/Executive Function (A/EF) (Table 2). Standardized domain scores were calculated using within-sample z-score standardization, and z-tests assessed differences in demographic impact on cognitive function between the two populations.
Result:
FHS participants were older, more educated, with a higher proportion of men compared to KoGES-CAVAS-CA (Table 1). While Memory and A/EF were stable across ages in FHS, significant decline with increasing age was found in KoGES-CAVAS-CA (Memory: z = 12.61, p < 0.001; A/EF: z = 3.81, p < 0.001). Language declined with age in both populations, but the decline was significantly greater in KoGES-CAVAS-CA compared to FHS (z = 4.66, p < 0.001). Higher education was associated with better cognitive performance in both populations, but its effect on Language (z = -3.19, p = 0.001) and VF (z = -8.31, p < 0.001) was stronger in KoGES-CAVAS-CA than in FHS. Sex differences were more pronounced in Language in KoGES-CAVAS-CA compared to FHS, where women scored lower than men in both populations (z = 6.61, p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
These findings highlight cross-cultural differences in how demographic factors influence cognitive function. The greater effect of education on Language and VF in KoGES-CAVAS-CA likely reflects differences in educational attainment between the two populations, with FHS having more college graduates and KoGES-CAVAS-CA participants averaging a middle school education. Additionally, more pronounced Language sex differences in KoGES-CAVAS-CA suggest sex-related cognitive differences may vary across cultural contexts. These results emphasize the need to consider demographic disparities in cognitive research.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

