Prognostic Value of CMR-Derived Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Broad Referral Populations
Ahsan A Khan1, Steven Dykstra1, Jacqueline Flewitt1
1Stephenson Cardiac Imaging Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Background:
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived left ventricle filling pressure (LVFPcmr) has shown strong correlation with invasively measured values and early promise as a prognostic marker in defined patient populations.
Objectives:
The authors sought to describe associations of LVFPcmr with future heart failure (HF) outcomes in a large, diverse CMR referral population with stratified analyses by left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) subgroups.
Methods:
We analyzed consecutively enrolled patients in the Cardiovascular Imaging Registry of Calgary registry between 2015 and 2021 followed for at least 3 years for the occurrence of HF hospitalization, cardiac transplantation, or LV assist device implantation. Subjects completed baseline patient-reported health questionnaires, followed by CMR imaging. Sex-specific LVFPcmr was calculated.
Results:
A total of 9,588 patients were analyzed (median age 57 years; 62% males). Over a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 1,142 patients (12%) experienced the primary outcome. LVFPcmr was significantly associated with the outcome after adjusting for clinically relevant variables (subdistribution HR: 1.988 for an LVFPcmr of 18.7 [Q3] vs 14.0 mm Hg [Q1]; 95% CI: 1.659-2.381; P < 0.001). Using a survival-based approach, an optimal cutpoint of 18 mm Hg for LVFPcmr was identified. LVFPcmr ≥18 mm Hg remained independently associated with the outcome in the overall cohort, as well as LVEF subgroups. Respective adjusted HR for patients with LVEF <40%, 40 to 50% and >50% were 1.510 (1.216-1.876), 1.582 (1.153-2.171), and 2.865 (2.307-3.559). The latter group demonstrated similar value in patients with vs without coronary disease.
Conclusions:
LVFPcmr is a powerful predictor of future HF outcomes in broad referral populations inclusive of patients with reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved LV function.
More Related Videos
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
08:21Biventricular Assessment of Cardiac Function and Pressure-Volume Loops by Closed-Chest Catheterization in Mice
Published on: June 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
