Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Clinical Manifestations.
Aline Siqueira de Souza1,2,3,4, João Vitor da Silva Viana5,6, Isabelle de Aguiar Maia6,7
1Sciences Applied to Adult Health Postgraduate Program, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
The Cognitive Domains and Functional Assessment Questionnaire-Participant Version (CDFAQ-PV) shows preliminary convergence with DSM-5 cognitive domains. Further analysis is needed to confirm the six-factor model for assessing cognitive decline.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience and Psychology
- Gerontology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- The Cognitive Domains and Functional Assessment Questionnaire (CDFAQ) is designed to evaluate cognitive and functional decline according to DSM-5 criteria for Neurocognitive Disorders.
- The participant version (CDFAQ-PV) is a 30-item self-report measure assessing six cognitive domains: Complex Attention, Executive Functions, Learning and Memory, Language, Perceptual-Motor, and Social Cognition.
- While the informant version (CDFAQ-IV) has been validated, the psychometric properties of the CDFAQ-PV, specifically its factor structure, require assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on the CDFAQ-PV.
- To evaluate the fit of a proposed six-factor model aligning with DSM-5 cognitive domains.
- To assess the psychometric validity of the CDFAQ-PV for measuring cognitive function in older adults.
Main Methods:
- A sample of 377 older adults completed the CDFAQ-PV.
- Confirmatory Factor Analysis was performed using JASP software with Lavaan R Packages.
- A manual six-factor model was specified and tested for goodness-of-fit.
Main Results:
- The CFA model demonstrated significant overall fit (X² p < .001).
- Good fit indices were observed for the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR = .065) and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI = .983).
- However, the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA = .073) and Comparative Fit Index (CFI = .792) fell below recommended thresholds, indicating areas for improvement.
Conclusions:
- The current six-factor model for the CDFAQ-PV shows mixed fit, with three parameters indicating good fit and two suggesting limitations.
- These preliminary findings suggest potential convergence between the CDFAQ-PV, CDFAQ-IV, and the DSM-5 cognitive domains.
- Further research with an expanded sample size is recommended to refine and validate the CDFAQ-PV's factor structure.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

