Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

06:11
Employing the Forced Oscillation Technique for the Assessment of Respiratory Mechanics in Adults
Published on: February 9, 2022
6.2K
Improving Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Test-Retest Reliability With Forward-Pressure Level Calibration on
Judi A Lapsley Miller1, Charlotte M Reed2, Zachary D Perez2
1Mimosa Acoustics, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Ear and Hearing
|December 26, 2025
Summary
Forward-pressure level (FPL) calibration improves distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) test-retest reliability compared to standard sound pressure level (SPL) calibration. This enhanced accuracy, especially at higher frequencies, allows for more reliable detection of smaller DPOAE changes.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Otoacoustic Emissions
- Acoustics
Background:
- Standard in situ calibration using sound pressure level (SPL) for distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) testing can introduce significant stimulus level errors (up to 20 dB) due to standing-wave nulls.
- Forward-pressure level (FPL) calibration, derived from wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) measurements, offers a more accurate method by mitigating these standing-wave effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare FPL and SPL calibration methods for DPOAE testing.
- To determine if FPL calibration yields clinically meaningful improvements in test-retest reliability.
- To assess the measurability, validity, and reliability of a prototype WAI and DPOAE system.
Main Methods:
- Nineteen adults with normal hearing (38 ears) participated in two experiments measuring WAI and DPOAEs across various frequencies (0.7-8 kHz).
- Measurements were conducted using the same probe fit for both SPL and FPL calibration methods, with probe removal and refitting between test and retest conditions to assess reliability.
- Experiment 2 utilized a longer sampling time (up to 32 seconds) compared to Experiment 1 (4 seconds).
Main Results:
- A maximum pressure response difference of 22 dB was observed between SPL and FPL calibration.
- DPOAE measurability was high for both methods, with no significant group mean DPOAE level differences in Experiment 1 and only a 2 dB difference at 8 kHz in Experiment 2.
- FPL calibration demonstrated improved test-retest reliability, with lower standard error of measurement and higher intraclass correlation coefficients, particularly at higher frequencies affected by standing-wave nulls.
Conclusions:
- FPL calibration offers clinically meaningful improvements in DPOAE test-retest reliability over SPL calibration, especially above 4 kHz.
- Longer averaging times can extend these reliability benefits to lower frequencies (down to 1 kHz).
- FPL calibration enables reliable detection of smaller DPOAE changes, potentially facilitating earlier intervention through serial monitoring.

