Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
Published on: December 11, 2016
Drug Development
Pieter Jelle Visser1, Pallavi Sachdev2, Satya Saxena2
1Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Background:
Alzheimer's disease (AD) exhibits significant molecular heterogeneity, which poses challenges for treatment development. Understanding this heterogeneity is essential for creating more effective therapies and improving patient outcomes. Our recent research identified five distinct AD subtypes based on protein level alterations: hyperplasticity (s1), innate immune activation (s2), RNA dysregulation (s3), choroid plexus dysfunction (s4), and blood-brain barrier dysfunction (s5). This study aims to determine if these subtypes can be identified in an independent cohort of early AD patients from a clinical trial.
Method:
Baseline cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 101 amyloid-positive and 101 amyloid-negative individuals (based on PET visual read) were collected from a Phase 3 program for elenbecestat in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia due to AD (NCT02956486). These samples were analyzed using 16-plex tandem mass tag (TMT) mass spectrometry. Each individual was classified into an AD molecular subtype using a random forest classifier trained on our previous discovery cohort, utilizing 1249 overlapping proteins between the studies. We then compared CSF protein levels across the new sample for each subtype and against the amyloid-negative group to assess amyloid specificity using linear regression models.
Result:
Amyloid-positive individuals exhibited SMOC1 levels one standard deviation higher than amyloid PET-negative individuals, confirming previous associations of SMOC1 with amyloid status (p < 0.01x10^-10) (see figures a-b). All five AD subtypes were identified in the amyloid-positive group: 45 (44%) were classified as hyperplasticity s1; 20 (20%) as innate immune activation s2; 1 (1%) as RNA dysregulation s3; 18 (18%) as choroid plexus s4; and 17 (17%) as blood-brain barrier dysfunction s5. Protein level comparisons across subtypes largely replicated our previous findings (see figures c-f for example subtype-specific proteins).
Conclusion:
The replication of the five AD molecular subtypes in an independent clinical trial cohort further supports the robustness of these subtypes and paves the way for personalized medicine and novel combination therapy approaches in AD. Reference 1. Tijms, B. M. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid proteomics in patients with Alzheimer's disease reveals five molecular subtypes with distinct genetic risk profiles. Nat. Aging 33-47 (2024) doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00550-7.
More Related Videos
08:04In Vitro Three-Dimensional Sprouting Assay of Angiogenesis Using Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells for Vascular Disease Modeling and Drug Testing
Published on: May 11, 2021
05:45Developmental Toxicity Assay Based on Real-Time Monitoring of Fibroblast Growth Factor Signal Disruption in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Published on: October 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials: Overview
Drug Discovery: Overview
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation
Drug Regulation