Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Blood group mythology: present status.

A S Wiener

    Acta Paediatrica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
    |January 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study debunks common medical myths about blood groups, including A-B-O type, Rh factor, and alleged links to diseases or temperament. It also critiques existing blood group nomenclature systems.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Heredity of Rh blood types; improved nomenclature; additional family studies with special reference to Hr.

    Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (New York, N.Y.)·2010
    Same author

    Pathogenesis of erythroblastosis fetalis.

    Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (New York, N.Y.)·2010
    Same author

    Technique of Rh testing.

    The American journal of medical technology·2010
    Same author

    Diagrammatic representation of the Rh blood types.

    American journal of clinical pathology·2010
    Same author

    Notes on the pathogenesis of congenital hemolytic disease (erythroblastosis fetalis).

    American journal of clinical pathology·2010
    Same author

    Theory and nomenclature of the Rh types, subtypes, and genotypes.

    British medical journal·2010

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Science
    • Immunology
    • Hematology

    Background:

    • Medical practice is often encumbered by persistent myths and misconceptions.
    • Several inaccuracies exist within the field of blood grouping, impacting clinical understanding and practice.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify and critically analyze prevalent myths and fallacious beliefs in blood grouping.
    • To provide a detailed examination of specific erroneous statements regarding blood types and their supposed associations.
    • To advocate for a revised nomenclature system in blood group genetics.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and critical analysis of existing beliefs in blood grouping.
    • Detailed examination of specific fallacious statements concerning A-B-O blood groups, Rh typing, and other blood group factors.
    • Comparative analysis of different blood group nomenclature systems.

    Main Results:

    • Debunked myths include the dependence of clot retraction shape on A-B-O blood group and the association of Dupuytren contracture with Rh1Rh2 type.
    • Challenged are assumptions linking blood groups to diseases, temperament, and the existence of factors like 'little d' and the LW factor.
    • The Race and Sanger system of symbols is deemed inadequate, with advantages of an alternative nomenclature highlighted.

    Conclusions:

    • Many widely held beliefs regarding blood grouping are scientifically unfounded.
    • Accurate understanding and clear communication in blood grouping require the debunking of persistent myths.
    • Adoption of a standardized and scientifically sound nomenclature system is crucial for advancing the field of blood group genetics.

    Related Experiment Videos