Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

503
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
503

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Ten years of the European association of endoscopic surgery (EAES) fellowship programme: outcomes and future perspective.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Fluorescence-guided lymph node identification for biopsy for suspected lymphoproliferative disease or excision of lymph node recurrence.

Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy·2026
Same author

Feasibility of laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) in colorectal surgery: a prospective comparison with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

The concept of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Rectus Aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique in complex abdominal hernias based on size and location.

BMC surgery·2026
Same author

Ventral hernia repair in emergency settings. A machine learning model to predict post-operative complications.

Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy·2026
Same author

Short-term impact of the 'Marginal Gains' standardised workflow for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME): a pre- and post-implementation study.

Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
09:40

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function

Published on: April 17, 2020

14.8K

Three Versus Two-Rows Circular Stapler in Colorectal Anastomosis: Short Term Outcomes.

Stefano Agnesi1, Marcello Schiavo1, Andrea Balla2

  • 1Department of General Surgery, Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy.

Surgical Innovation
|December 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Three-row circular staplers (CSs) significantly reduce anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal cancer surgery compared to two-row CSs. This innovation also leads to shorter hospital stays, improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.

Keywords:
colorectal surgerygeneral surgerysurgical oncology

More Related Videos

The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage
07:51

The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage

Published on: November 4, 2010

22.4K
Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
09:40

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function

Published on: April 17, 2020

14.8K
The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage
07:51

The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage

Published on: November 4, 2010

22.4K
Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication following colorectal cancer surgery, impacting patient health and healthcare economics.
  • Conventional two-row circular staplers (CSs) may compromise anastomotic integrity and perfusion.
  • Three-row CSs offer potential for enhanced anastomotic integrity and perfusion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare short-term outcomes of two-row versus three-row CSs in colorectal anastomosis.
  • To evaluate the impact of stapler type on anastomotic leakage (AL) rates.
  • To assess the effect of stapler type on hospital length of stay (LOS).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2013-2025.
  • Inclusion of consecutive patients undergoing elective left hemicolectomy, sigmoidectomy, or anterior resection for cancer with primary anastomosis.
  • Comparison of AL rates and severity between patients receiving two-row CSs (control) and three-row CSs (intervention).

Main Results:

  • The three-row CS group showed a significantly lower AL rate (3.7%) compared to the two-row CS group (11.8%; P=0.02).
  • Patients in the three-row CS group experienced significantly shorter hospital stays (P=0.04).
  • Multivariate analysis identified two-row CS use as an independent adverse predictor of AL (OR 3.79; P=0.03).

Conclusions:

  • The use of three-row CSs is associated with a reduced postoperative AL rate.
  • Three-row CSs contribute to a shorter length of stay (LOS) post-surgery.
  • Three-row CSs represent an advancement in surgical technique for colorectal cancer resection, enhancing anastomotic safety.