Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Clinical Manifestations
Cristian Muñoz1,2, Nilton Custodio3, Rosa Montesinos3
1CIMT Center for Medical Informatics and Telemedicine, School of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Background:
Functional impairment (FI) is a key component in diagnosing and monitoring the severity of neurodegenerative dementia (ND). It manifests in several dimensions, such as everyday cognition, mobility, social functioning, and activities of daily living (ADLs). However, traditional assessments have primarily focused on ADLs, often neglecting the other dimensions of functional phenotype. This study aims to assess the utility of the Chilean multidimensional functional assessment (Ch-MFA, see Figure 1), including ADLs, social behavior, mobility, and everyday cognition in differentiating Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and to predict their severity measured in the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR).
Method:
308 patients were recruited in Peru, comprising 209 controls, 44 FTD, and 55 AD. Functional assessments include ADL (T-ADLQ, DAD-E), social behavior Blessed Dementia Rating Scale (BDR), mobility (WHODAS), everyday cognition (ECog), and CDR for severity. Data was normalized for each assessment, and groups were stratified regarding age and educational level, obtaining 72 controls, 24 FTD, and 45 AD for the predictive analysis. Random Forest (RF) models were trained using 70% of the data, while 30% was reserved for testing the prediction. Cross-validation (20-fold) and feature selection were used to reduce overfitting and identify a simpler set of questions.
Result:
The Ch-MFA indicates a 0.81 ± 0.03 average f1-score when differentiating the group (control, FTD, and AD), which is 0.12 ± 0.10 better than the best-performing unidimensional assessment (T-ADLQ) with only 14 questions (4 T-ADLQ, 2 BDR, 4 ECog and 3 WHODAS). As for the severity, Ch-MFA shows a 0.65 ± 0.17 average f1-score when differentiating severities of 0.5, 1, and 2, increasing to 0.88 ± 0.06 when it's only between 1 and 2 with a total of 4 questions (2 T-ADLQ, 2 ECog). See Figure 2.
Conclusion:
Our results show that the Ch-MFA achieves better results than a unidimensional assessment. Interestingly, functional dimensions that distinguish types of dementia differed from those that predict their severity. Our results suggest that a multidimensional phenotype may better reflect the specificity of dementia subtypes.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

