NO/iNOS axis impact on glioma stem cells and temozolomide resistance

Elsa Hincapié-Arias1,2, Carolina Moughty-Cueto3, Juan Manuel Zaloff-Dakoff3

  • 1Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Área de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Journal of Molecular Medicine (Berlin, Germany)
|December 26, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) fuels glioma stem cells (GSCs) and temozolomide (TMZ) resistance in glioblastoma. Inhibiting iNOS alongside TMZ treatment offers a promising strategy to target GSCs and prevent tumor recurrence.

Area of Science:

  • Neuro-oncology
  • Cancer Stem Cell Biology
  • Molecular Oncology

Background:

  • Glioblastoma (GB) invariably recurs due to glioma stem cells (GSCs).
  • Temozolomide (TMZ) resistance is a major challenge in glioblastoma treatment.
  • The role of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in GSC maintenance and drug resistance is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of the iNOS/nitric oxide (NO) axis in sustaining the GSC niche.
  • To determine the impact of iNOS inhibition on GSC frequency and TMZ resistance.
  • To evaluate a sequential treatment strategy combining TMZ and iNOS inhibition for glioblastoma.

Main Methods:

  • In silico analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data for iNOS expression and patient survival.
  • In vitro studies using glioblastoma cell lines and primary human glioma cultures to assess GSC characteristics.
  • Treatment with the iNOS inhibitor S-methylisothiourea (SMT) alone and in combination with TMZ.
  • Assessment of cell viability, GSC frequency, and sphere formation efficiency.

Main Results:

  • Higher iNOS expression in glioma samples correlated with poorer patient survival.
  • GSC-enriched cultures showed significantly higher iNOS expression and NO levels compared to differentiated cells.
  • iNOS inhibition with SMT reduced GSC frequency and growth.
  • Sequential treatment with TMZ followed by TMZ + SMT demonstrated enhanced efficacy in reducing glioblastoma cell viability and GSC growth compared to TMZ alone.

Conclusions:

  • The iNOS/NO axis is crucial for maintaining the GSC niche and contributes to TMZ resistance in glioblastoma.
  • Targeting iNOS can disrupt the GSC niche and sensitize glioblastoma cells to TMZ.
  • Sequential TMZ and iNOS inhibition presents a potential therapeutic strategy to overcome glioblastoma recurrence by targeting GSCs.