Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Investigation of the Transcriptional Role of a RUNX1 Intronic Silencer by CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells
Published on: September 1, 2019
t(8;21)(q23;q22), a Novel Translocation Involving the RUNX1 Gene in a Patient with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Liang Wang1, Elizabeth Sagatys2, Hailing Zhang2
1Senior Member, Dept. of Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
This study details an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) case initially appearing to have a t(8;21)(q22;q22) translocation. Further testing revealed a different translocation, t(8;21)(q23;q22), without the expected RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion gene.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Cytogenetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Chromosome translocations involving the RUNX1 gene are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
- The t(8;21)(q22;q22) translocation, resulting in the RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion gene, defines a distinct AML subtype.
- Accurate identification of translocations is crucial for diagnosis and classification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate a case of AML with an initial diagnosis suggestive of t(8;21)(q22;q22) translocation.
- To clarify the genetic abnormality when standard tests for RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion are negative.
- To re-evaluate cytogenetic findings using integrated molecular and cytogenetic data.
Main Methods:
- Initial cytogenetic analysis (karyotyping) to detect chromosome translocations.
- Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to specifically identify the RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion gene.
- Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to detect RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion transcripts.
- Reassessment of karyotyping in conjunction with FISH and RT-PCR results.
Main Results:
- Initial karyotyping suggested a t(8;21)(q22;q22)-like translocation.
- FISH analysis failed to detect the RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion signals.
- RT-PCR also did not confirm the presence of the RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion gene.
- Re-evaluation of cytogenetics identified a variant translocation, t(8;21)(q23;q22).
Conclusions:
- The study highlights the importance of integrating multiple diagnostic techniques in AML.
- Atypical presentations of common translocations require careful reassessment.
- The identified t(8;21)(q23;q22) translocation represents a distinct genetic event in this AML case, differing from the canonical t(8;21)(q22;q22).
Related Concept Videos
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy...
Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...
Abnormal Proliferation
Differentiation of Common Myeloid Progenitor Cells

