Aseptic revision from one rotating-hinge to another rotating-hinge prosthesis - how good are the results?

Evidence on the outcome of aseptic exchange of rotating-hinge prosthesis is missing in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate implant survival, complication rates, and clinical outcomes following revision of a rotating-hinge prosthesis to another rotating-hinge prosthesis with anatomical axis.

Between March 2014 and Juli 2023 62 cases of aseptic exchange of a rotating-hinge prosthesis were performed at a tertiary medical center in Germany. In this retrospective study, all patients were contacted for clinical follow-up and prosthesis survival. Implant survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Score.

The 5-year implant survival rate was 83.4% (73.2-93.6, 95%-CI) for revision due to any reason, 85.1% (75.3-94.9, 95%-CI) for aseptic failure and 98.0% (94.1-100.0, 95%-CI: ) for septic failure. The estimated 10-year survival rates were 73.2% (59.2-87.1%; 95%-CI), 78.0% (65.1-90.9%; 95%-CI), and 93.9% (85.3-100.0%; 95%-CI), respectively. Improvements were observed in all KSS subdomains except for the Patient Expectation Score.

The exchange of a rotating-hinge prosthesis, using metaphyseal cones when indicated for bone defects, yields implant survival and complication rates comparable to those of primary rotating-hinge prosthesis implantation. However, clinical outcome scores tend to be lower than those reported for first-time implantation of rotating-hinge prostheses.