Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies
Published on: January 28, 2014
Biomarkers
Rozelle C Kane1, Leonidas Chouliaras2, Simon Griffin1
1University of Cambridge, CAMBRIDGE, NA, United Kingdom.
Background:
There is an urgent need for population-specific predictive risk models for dementia that address earlier stages of the disease continuum. Blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) have demonstrated excellent discrimination in high pre-test probability populations, such as memory clinics. However, their performance in general population settings, where pre-test probabilities are lower, remains underexplored. BBMs have the potential to enable earlier, targeted interventions, improve access to clinical trials, and enhance diagnostic accuracy in primary care. This systematic review synthesizes and meta-analyzes the evidence on the predictive performance of BBMs in longitudinal models, focusing on their utility in primary care contexts.
Method:
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on studies evaluating the longitudinal predictive performance of BBMs, including p-tau181, p-tau217, p-tau231, Aβ, GFAP, and NfL. Eligible studies included pre-dementia populations reporting predictive performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of study setting, BBM combinations, baseline characteristics, and outcome (disease conversion vs. cognitive decline).
Result:
Of 205 full-text studies reviewed, 32 met inclusion criteria, comprising models predicting dementia conversion (n = 20) or cognitive decline (n = 12). Most participants were from memory clinics (n = 20), fewer from community (n = 9) or combined settings (n = 3). Model reference covariates included age, sex, APOEε4 genotype, education (n = 24 models). Overall predictive performance was excellent, with pooled AUCs of 0.89 [95% CI: 0.85-0.92] in memory clinic populations and 0.85 [95% CI: 0.80-0.89] in community populations. Models stratified by symptomatology showed higher AUCs for symptomatic vs asymptomatic individuals (AUC=0.89, [95% CI: 0.86-0.91]) and (AUC=0.79, [95% CI: 0.76-0.78]). p-tau181 performed better in single-marker models (AUC=0.97, [95% CI: 0.94-1.00]) than in combination (AUC=0.87, [95% CI: 0.83-0.92]). Predictive performance was particularly strong in conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's dementia (p-tau181, AUC=0.91, [95% CI: 0.90-0.93]).
Conclusion:
Longitudinal BBM models demonstrate robust predictive ability for incident dementia and cognitive decline, even in the context of high heterogeneity across primary care and community settings. Early phases of disease, offer opportunities for stratified prediction. However, large observational trials in primary care are required to validate these findings, refine and optimise models for real-world deployment.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...

