Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Segmenting outpatient appointment behavior: a data-driven approach to understanding no-shows, delays, and walk-ins in
Damla Azakli Yazici1, Ecem Bilensoy1, Ayşe Bahadir1
1Pulmonology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, G-434 Street No. 2L, Basaksehir District, Istanbul, 34480,Turkey.
Background:
Outpatient appointment disruptions-particularly no-shows, late arrivals, and walk-ins-undermine clinic efficiency and equity in access to care. Despite decades of research, predictors of attendance behavior remain poorly understood, especially in respiratory care settings.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional study of 520 patients attending a pulmonology outpatient clinic in Turkey over 12 weekdays. Patients were classified as on-time attendees, late attendees, no-shows, or walk-in visitors. Data on sociodemographic, clinical, logistical, and behavioral factors were collected via structured surveys administered in person or, for no-shows, by phone; some variables (e.g. employment and insurance) had substantial missingness. Logistic regression identified predictors of non-attendance. An unsupervised clustering analysis (Partitioning Around Medoids using Gower distance) was used to identify patient subgroups with distinct attendance patterns.
Results:
Among 520 patients, 386 (74.2%) arrived on time, 64 (12.3%) were late, 48 (9.2%) missed appointments, and 22 (4.2%) were walk-ins. On-time attendees were older and more likely to have received appointment reminders. No-shows were younger, more educated, and less likely to receive reminders. The leading causes of lateness were transportation issues (45.9%) and difficulty locating the clinic (31.1%). In multivariable analysis, younger age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.964; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.938-0.992; P = .010) and absence of reminders (OR = 4.275; 95% CI = 2.013-9.081; P < .001) were independently associated with non-attendance. Clustering analysis identified three phenotypes: "Older Dependent" (older, comorbid, low socioeconomic status), "Young Autonomous" (younger, high socioeconomic status, high no-show rate), and "Access-Challenged" (employed, low insurance coverage, high lateness).
Conclusion:
Appointment reminders and age are strong, actionable predictors of attendance. Behavioral segmentation revealed latent patient profiles with distinct needs. Personalized scheduling strategies-especially targeted reminders and flexible systems-may improve outpatient efficiency and reduce inequities. These findings support the integration of behavioral clustering into appointment optimization frameworks.Keywords: outpatient appointments; no-show behavior; appointment reminders.
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...

