Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is an Ecosystem?01:17

What is an Ecosystem?

46.5K
Overview
46.5K
Competition02:34

Competition

24.2K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
24.2K
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

36.8K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
36.8K
Ecological Disturbance02:26

Ecological Disturbance

20.6K
An ecological disturbance is a temporary disruption in the environment resulting from abiotic, biotic, or anthropogenic factors, causing a pronounced change in an ecosystem. The impact of an ecological disturbance, which can depend on its intensity, frequency, and spatial distribution, plays a significant role in shaping the species diversity within the ecosystem.
20.6K
Keystone Species01:39

Keystone Species

24.1K
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a...
24.1K
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

21.0K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
21.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fluctuating Growth Rates Link Turnover and Unevenness in Species-Rich Communities.

Ecology letters·2026
Same author

Stabilization of macroscopic dynamics by fine-grained disorder in many-species ecosystems.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Collective dynamical regimes predict invasion success and impacts in microbial communities.

Nature ecology & evolution·2025
Same author

A taxonomy of multiple stable states in complex ecological communities.

Ecology letters·2024
Same author

Chaotic turnover of rare and abundant species in a strongly interacting model community.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

How collectively integrated are ecological communities?

Ecology letters·2024
Same journal

Another 10 years of PLOS Computational Biology: A data-driven reflection on trends in genomics research.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Mobility data resolution needed to inform predictive models of spatial epidemic spread from mobile phone data.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

DeepMethylation: A deep learning framework for tissue-specific DNA methylation prediction and functional variant annotation.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Redefining and estimating the early-phase reproduction ratio for epidemic outbreaks in spatially structured populations.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Optimized phenotype definitions boost GWAS power.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.3K

Interplay of structured and random interactions in complex ecosystems dynamics.

Juan Giral Martínez1, Matthieu Barbier2,3,4, Silvia De Monte1,5

  • 1Institut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure, Département de Biologie, École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, Paris, France.

Plos Computational Biology
|December 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Ecological network structure significantly impacts ecosystem dynamics. While random interaction models offer insights, incorporating network structure reveals crucial differences in predicting species abundance and community stability, especially out of equilibrium.

More Related Videos

JenaTron - An Experimental Approach to Study the Effects of Plant History and Soil History on Grassland Ecosystem Functioning
09:23

JenaTron - An Experimental Approach to Study the Effects of Plant History and Soil History on Grassland Ecosystem Functioning

Published on: March 21, 2025

1.8K
Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
09:19

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.3K
JenaTron - An Experimental Approach to Study the Effects of Plant History and Soil History on Grassland Ecosystem Functioning
09:23

JenaTron - An Experimental Approach to Study the Effects of Plant History and Soil History on Grassland Ecosystem Functioning

Published on: March 21, 2025

1.8K
Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
09:19

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Theoretical Ecology
  • Network Science

Background:

  • Minimal ecosystem models often assume random species interactions.
  • Ecological networks frequently exhibit structures like hierarchies and functional groups.
  • Existing models may not fully capture real-world ecosystem complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how community-level network structures alter predictions from random interaction models.
  • To understand the interplay between randomness and structure in ecological networks.
  • To assess the impact of network structure on macroscopic community observables.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Lotka-Volterra model incorporating both structured and random pairwise species interactions.
  • Studied macroscopic community-level observables, including abundance distributions and dynamical regimes.
  • Analyzed the combined effects of randomness and network structure on ecosystem patterns.

Main Results:

  • Contributions from randomness and structure to community patterns are largely independent.
  • The interplay between structure and randomness has non-trivial consequences, particularly in out-of-equilibrium conditions.
  • Static patterns (species presence, abundance) are less robust to network structure than dynamical regimes.

Conclusions:

  • The importance of interaction structure depends on the specific ecological pattern being studied.
  • Random interaction models may provide less robust predictions for static community properties compared to dynamical behaviors.
  • Incorporating network structure is essential for accurate ecological modeling, especially for understanding ecosystem stability and dynamics.