Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
Comparison of Different Side Branch Ballooning Following Provisional Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesion-Related
Cemalettin Akman1,2, Ahmet Güner2, Regayip Zehir3
1Department of Cardiology, Adiyaman University Training and Research Hospital, Turkey.
Insights
This study compared two stenting techniques for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. Both proximal optimization technique-kissing-proximal optimization technique (PKP) and POT-side-POT (PSP) showed similar overall outcomes, but PKP reduced target lesion revascularization in left main cases.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) often involves complex coronary artery lesions.
- Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) present unique challenges in percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Provisional stenting (PS) with proximal optimization technique (POT) is a common strategy, with variations like kissing-POT (PKP) and POT-side-POT (PSP).
Purpose of the Study:
- To retrospectively assess and compare the clinical outcomes of PKP versus PSP techniques in STEMI patients with culprit CBLs after PS.
- To identify predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A large-scale, multicenter retrospective study involving 596 STEMI patients with culprit CBLs treated with either PKP or PSP following PS.
- Primary endpoint: MACE, defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR).
- Statistical analysis included hazard ratios (HR) and P-values to compare outcomes and identify independent predictors of MACE.
Main Results:
- Overall mid-term MACE rates were comparable between the PKP and PSP groups (HR: 0.921, P=.461).
- Significantly lower rates of main vessel-TLR (0% vs 30%, P=.001) and main vessel-TVMI (0% vs 20%, P=.014) were observed in the PKP group specifically for left main bifurcation lesions.
- Independent predictors of MACE included diabetes mellitus (HR: 2.628, P<.001), high SYNTAX score (HR: 1.081, P<.001), and bifurcation localization (HR: 2.109, P=.014).
Conclusions:
- In the overall STEMI population with culprit CBLs treated with PS, both PKP and PSP techniques demonstrate comparable mid-term clinical outcomes.
- The PKP technique may offer a significant advantage in reducing TLR and TVMI in left main bifurcation lesions.
- Diabetes, high SYNTAX score, and lesion location are critical factors influencing MACE in these patients.
Abstract:
The present study retrospectively assessed clinical outcomes of proximal optimization technique (POT)-kissing-POT (PKP) and POT-side-POT (PSP) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with culprit coronary bifurcation lesion (CBL) following a provisional stenting (PS). This large-scale multicenter (n = 10) study included STEMI patients with culprit CBLs who underwent PKP or PSP following PS. The primary endpoint was defined as the major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction [TVMI], or clinically driven target lesion revascularization [TLR]). Consecutive patients (n = 596; male: 491 [82.3%], mean age: 58.1 ± 11.7 years) were included. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups: PKP (n = 386) and PSP (n = 210). In the overall population, mid-term MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.921, P = .461) did not differ in individuals with CBL-related STEMI treated with either PKP or PSP. The frequency of main vessel-TLR (0% vs 30%, P = .001) and main vessel-TVMI (0% vs 20%, P = .014) were significantly lower in the PKP group in the left main bifurcation localization. Diabetes mellitus (HR: 2.628, P < .001), high SYNTAX score (HR: 1.081, P < .001), and bifurcation localization (HR: 2.109, P = .014) were found to be independent predictors of MACE. In the overall population, risk-adjusted MACE rates for culprit CBLs were comparable between both techniques.