Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

08:52
3D Ultrasound Imaging: Fast and Cost-effective Morphometry of Musculoskeletal Tissue
Published on: November 27, 2017
23.9K
Assessing gluteus medius volume with freehand 3DUS: validating a practical imaging tool for complex muscle morphology
Ali Karimi Azandariani1, Megan Gordon1, Irene Kaiser1
1School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
|December 27, 2025
Summary
Freehand three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) offers a valid and reliable method for measuring gluteus medius (GMed) muscle volume. This accessible technique serves as a practical alternative to MRI in clinical and research settings.
Area of Science:
- Musculoskeletal imaging
- Biomedical engineering
- Anatomy
Background:
- Accurate muscle morphology assessment is crucial for clinical and research applications.
- Existing imaging techniques may have limitations in accessibility or applicability to complex muscle structures.
- The gluteus medius (GMed) muscle's complex shape presents challenges for volumetric analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity and reliability of freehand three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) using a multiple-sweep technique for GMed muscle volume measurement.
- To compare 3DUS measurements against magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference standard.
- To assess the intra- and inter-processor reliability of the 3DUS method.
Main Methods:
- Twelve healthy participants underwent both 3DUS and MRI scans of the GMed.
- 3DUS utilized three overlapping sweeps for volumetric data acquisition.
- Independent segmentation of 3DUS and MRI images by two processors to calculate muscle volume.
- Bland-Altman analysis for agreement between 3DUS and MRI; ICC, CV%, TE, and MDC for reliability assessments.
Main Results:
- Minimal mean difference observed between 3DUS and MRI, with good agreement and no systematic bias.
- Excellent inter- and intra-processor reliability for 3DUS measurements (ICC = 0.972 and 0.999, respectively).
- Good between-position reliability (ICC = 0.94) was found in a subgroup analysis comparing prone and side-lying positions.
Conclusions:
- Freehand 3DUS with a multiple-sweep technique is a valid and reliable method for measuring GMed muscle volume.
- This 3DUS approach offers a practical and accessible alternative to MRI for both clinical and research settings.
- The technique demonstrates high consistency across different processors and measurement positions.

