Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Impact of Modified Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Prevention Bundle on Clinical Parameters and Outcomes Among
Yuvaraj Arumugam1, Judie Arulappan2, Sivakumar M Nandakumar3
1Faculty - Adult Health Nursing, Oman College of Health Sciences - Nursing Program, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Background:
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a significant global health concern and one of the most common healthcare-associated infections, contributing to increased patient mortality and morbidity.
Aim:
This study evaluated the impact of a modified VAP prevention bundle on clinical parameters and patient outcomes among individuals receiving mechanical ventilation.
Study Design:
A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study design was adopted. The study was carried out over a period of 18 months in the adult intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital in Coimbatore, India. The intervention group received a modified VAP prevention bundle, whereas the control group received the routine VAP prevention bundle. Data collection was performed using the Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (mCPIS).
Results:
A total of 420 patients were recruited through convenience sampling, of whom 56.1% were men. Significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) usage, duration of mechanical ventilation and re-intubation rates. The intervention group had higher NIV usage, while the mechanical ventilation duration and re-intubation rate were lower compared to the control group. The overall VAP infection rate after the intervention was 6.19% in the intervention group and 14.29% in the control group [p = 0.01; OR=2.5; 95% CI (1.3-4.9)], indicating a highly significant reduction. Similarly, the early-onset VAP rate was 9.3% in the intervention group and 27.9% in the control group. In terms of clinical outcomes, 86.19% of patients in the intervention group and 77.14% in the control group showed improvement. The mortality rate was markedly lower in the intervention group (16.7% vs. 32.56%). Further analysis revealed that increased NIV usage, longer mechanical ventilation duration, higher re-intubation rates, prolonged ICU stay, extended additional length of stay and longer hospital stay were significant influencing factors for the development of VAP.
Conclusion:
The modified VAP prevention bundle was effective in reducing the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Relevance To Clinical Practice:
The modified VAP prevention bundle is effective in reducing the incidence of VAP and improving outcomes among mechanically ventilated patients. As it requires minimal resources and effort, critical care nurses should incorporate this bundle into routine practice to enhance patient safety and quality of care.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed....

