Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

04:30
A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
26.2K
Off-Label Stent as a Rescue Option for Angulated Proximal Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis in Technically Unfeasible
Gokhan Ozdemir1, Fettah Eren2, Ayse Nur Ersoy2
1Department of Neurology, Selcuk University Medical Faculty, Stroke Centre, Konya, Turkey. noro.ozdemir@gmail.com.
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
|December 28, 2025
Summary
Off-label stenting is a feasible and safe option for complex carotid artery stenosis when standard procedures fail. This approach offers good vessel patency and functional recovery in challenging anatomical cases.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Neurology
Background:
- Extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis poses a significant risk for stroke.
- Anatomically challenging cases often limit treatment options like carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and conventional carotid artery stenting (CAS).
- Off-label use of intracranial stents may be a viable alternative in these complex scenarios.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of using off-label intracranial stents for extracranial ICA revascularization.
- To evaluate this strategy in patients with anatomically challenging proximal ICA stenosis where standard revascularization is unfeasible.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective multicenter cohort study of 1,522 patients undergoing carotid revascularization (2017-2025).
- Compared three groups: off-label intracranial stent use, conventional CAS, and CEA.
- Analyzed technical success, 30-day mortality, 3-month restenosis (≥50%), and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2).
Main Results:
- The off-label group (n=48) had higher rates of near-occlusion/occlusion (68.8%) and symptomatic presentation (100%) compared to CAS and CEA.
- Technical success was high across all groups (100% off-label/CEA, 99.4% CAS).
- Thirty-day mortality and 3-month restenosis rates were comparable. Functional independence significantly improved in the off-label group (31.3% to 100%).
Conclusions:
- Off-label stenting demonstrates high technical feasibility and acceptable safety in complex proximal ICA stenosis.
- This approach leads to meaningful functional recovery, serving as a potential rescue option for carefully selected patients.
- It addresses limitations of CEA and standard CAS in anatomically difficult cases.

