Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

543
Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
543
Brain Waves01:23

Brain Waves

3.8K
Brain waves are electrical signals generated by the neurons in the brain, which are regularly monitored to measure mental activities. Brain waves and their frequency ranges can be measured using an electroencephalogram or EEG. There are four main types of brain waves, each with distinct characteristics:
3.8K
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

681
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
681

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuroimmune Clearance and EEG Biomarkers: A Unified Model of ASD and Dyslexia.

Neural plasticity·2026
Same author

Electroencephalography-Based Machine Learning for Biomarker Detection in Dyslexia and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comparative Review of Models, Features, and Diagnostic Utility.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Electroencephalography Signatures Associated with Developmental Dyslexia Identified Using Principal Component Analysis.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Correction: Eroğlu, G. Electroencephalography-Based Neuroinflammation Diagnosis and Its Role in Learning Disabilities. <i>Diagnostics</i> 2025, <i>15</i>, 764.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Electroencephalography-Based Neuroinflammation Diagnosis and Its Role in Learning Disabilities.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

k-Means clustering by using the calculated Z-scores from QEEG data of children with dyslexia.

Applied neuropsychology. Child·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K

Theta and Beta1 Frequency Band Values Predict Dyslexia Classification.

Günet Eroğlu1, Mhd Raja Abou Harb2

  • 1Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Dyslexia (Chichester, England)
|December 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning accurately predicts dyslexia using brainwave data. Neurofeedback therapy shows higher theta and lower beta1 brainwave activity in dyslexic children, aiding diagnosis.

Keywords:
QEEGauto train braindyslexia detectionsupervised machine learning techniques

More Related Videos

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.7K
Automatic Detection of Highly Organized Theta Oscillations in the Murine EEG
09:35

Automatic Detection of Highly Organized Theta Oscillations in the Murine EEG

Published on: March 10, 2017

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K
Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.7K
Automatic Detection of Highly Organized Theta Oscillations in the Murine EEG
09:35

Automatic Detection of Highly Organized Theta Oscillations in the Murine EEG

Published on: March 10, 2017

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Dyslexia significantly impacts children's reading abilities, leading families to explore effective and affordable interventions like neurofeedback therapy.
  • Accurate and early identification of dyslexia is crucial for timely intervention and support.
  • Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) offers a non-invasive method for assessing brain activity patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify predictive factors for dyslexia classification using machine learning.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of machine learning models in classifying dyslexia based on QEEG data.
  • To investigate specific neurophysiological differences between dyslexic and typically developing children.

Main Methods:

  • Collected 14-channel Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) data from 200 participants.
  • Utilized machine learning algorithms for predictive modeling and classification of dyslexia.
  • Performed cross-validation and validation analyses to assess model performance.

Main Results:

  • Achieved 99.6% accuracy in classifying dyslexic individuals through cross-validation.
  • During validation, 48% of dyslexic children's sessions were misclassified as normal (95% CI: 47.31-48.68).
  • Dyslexic individuals consistently showed higher theta and lower beta1 brainwave values compared to controls.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning, applied to QEEG data, demonstrates high potential for dyslexia classification.
  • Specific QEEG patterns (elevated theta, reduced beta1) are associated with dyslexia.
  • Findings provide valuable insights for families considering neurofeedback therapy for dyslexia.