Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.7K
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

5.0K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
5.0K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

415
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
415
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.3K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.3K
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics01:28

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

1.3K
Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...
1.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.6K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Random kernel k-nearest neighbors regression.

Frontiers in big data·2024
Same author

Development of a Predictive Model to Correlate the Chemical Structure of Amines with Their Oxidative Degradation Rate in a Post-Combustion Amine-Based CO<sub>2</sub> Capture Process Using Multiple Linear Regression and Machine Learning Regression Approaches.

ACS omega·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.7K

Posterior averaging with Gaussian naive Bayes and the R package RandomGaussianNB for big-data classification.

Patchanok Srisuradetchai1

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Frontiers in Big Data
|December 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The RandomGaussianNB R package introduces posterior-averaging Gaussian naive Bayes (PAV-GNB) for scalable classification. This ensemble method enhances stability and accuracy in high-dimensional data while maintaining efficiency.

Keywords:
R packagebootstrap aggregationclassificationensemble learningprobabilistic calibration

More Related Videos

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.3K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

470

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.7K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.3K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

470

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Statistical Computing
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Classical Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB) classifiers can struggle with correlation bias and stability in high-dimensional data.
  • Ensemble methods offer potential improvements but can be computationally intensive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the RandomGaussianNB R package, implementing the posterior-averaging Gaussian naive Bayes (PAV-GNB) algorithm.
  • To provide a scalable, interpretable, and computationally efficient ensemble extension of GNB.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the RandomGaussianNB R package for PAV-GNB classification.
  • Utilized posterior averaging to create an ensemble of GNB classifiers.
  • Conducted theoretical analysis on ensemble posterior variance and generalization bounds.
  • Performed simulation studies under big-data conditions and real-world dataset application.

Main Results:

  • PAV-GNB demonstrated consistent accuracy and low variance in simulations, aligning with theoretical predictions.
  • The ensemble size inversely affected posterior variance, enhancing stability.
  • Scalability experiments showed near-linear runtime improvements with multi-core processing.
  • The Pima Indians Diabetes dataset application confirmed PAV-GNB's reliability and efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • RandomGaussianNB offers a statistically grounded, interpretable, and efficient approach for large-scale classification.
  • PAV-GNB effectively mitigates bias and enhances stability in high-dimensional settings.
  • The R package provides a parallel and reproducible framework for advanced naive Bayes classification.