Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Analyzing Beneficial Effects of Nutritional Supplements on Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Functions During Experimental Colitis
Published on: January 5, 2017
Comparing the Efficacy of Intravenous Versus Oral Iron Supplementation for Anemic Patients With Inflammatory Bowel
Basim S Alharbi1, Bashair Z Alqaidi2, Fouad S Alharbi3
1Gastroenterology, Imam Abdulrahman Al Faisal Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a frequent complication in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) and adversely affects patient outcomes and quality of life. Oral iron supplementation is widely used but can be poorly tolerated and less effective during active inflammation. Intravenous (IV) iron supplementation bypasses intestinal absorption barriers, but its comparative efficacy in IBD remains under debate. This study aims to compare the efficacy of IV versus oral iron supplementation in achieving effective hemoglobin increases in patients with IBD-associated anemia. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted up to March 2022, yielding 711 records. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion criteria, seven studies (six randomized controlled trials and one prospective study), involving 1,029 patients, were included. Data were pooled using a fixed-effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a clinically meaningful hemoglobin increase. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots. Across the seven included studies, IV iron supplementation was significantly more effective than oral iron in increasing hemoglobin levels in IBD-associated anemia. The pooled OR was 1.45 (95% CI: 1.11-1.90; p = 0.006), favoring IV iron. Heterogeneity was minimal (I² = 2%, p = 0.41). Funnel plot analysis showed symmetrical distribution, suggesting a low likelihood of publication bias. In conclusion, IV iron supplementation provides a statistically and clinically significant advantage over oral iron for treating anemia in patients with IBD, with consistent results across diverse populations and minimal heterogeneity. These findings support guideline recommendations favoring IV iron, particularly in patients with active disease, intolerance to oral formulations, or the need for rapid anemia correction.
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a frequent complication in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) and adversely affects patient outcomes and quality of life. Oral iron supplementation is widely used but can be poorly tolerated and less effective during active inflammation. Intravenous (IV) iron supplementation bypasses intestinal absorption barriers, but its comparative efficacy in IBD remains under debate. This study aims to compare the efficacy of IV versus oral iron supplementation in achieving effective hemoglobin increases in patients with IBD-associated anemia. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted up to March 2022, yielding 711 records. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion criteria, seven studies (six randomized controlled trials and one prospective study), involving 1,029 patients, were included. Data were pooled using a fixed-effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a clinically meaningful hemoglobin increase. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots. Across the seven included studies, IV iron supplementation was significantly more effective than oral iron in increasing hemoglobin levels in IBD-associated anemia. The pooled OR was 1.45 (95% CI: 1.11-1.90; p = 0.006), favoring IV iron. Heterogeneity was minimal (I² = 2%, p = 0.41). Funnel plot analysis showed symmetrical distribution, suggesting a low likelihood of publication bias. In conclusion, IV iron supplementation provides a statistically and clinically significant advantage over oral iron for treating anemia in patients with IBD, with consistent results across diverse populations and minimal heterogeneity. These findings support guideline recommendations favoring IV iron, particularly in patients with active disease, intolerance to oral formulations, or the need for rapid anemia correction.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease II: Crohn's Disease
Inflammatory bowel disease, commonly known as IBD, refers to a collection of disorders that lead to persistent inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The two types of IBD are ulcerative colitis, which impacts the colon, and Crohn's disease, which can involve any part of the gastrointestinal segment.
Crohn's disease
Crohn's disease is a chronic, systemic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that predominantly affects the gastrointestinal tract. It is marked by...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

