The use of research evidence in blood collection policy and practice: a qualitative study with frontline staff, middle managers and senior managers
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies
Published on: January 28, 2014
Amanda Thijsen1,2, Barbara Masser3,4, Tanya E Davison5,6
1School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. athi7791@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Background:
There is a known disconnect between scientific knowledge and its application in routine practice, known as the research-practice gap. A potential strategy to encourage research engagement among end-users is embedding researchers within an organization. This study set out to understand the views and experiences of senior managers, middle managers, and frontline staff in one department accessing and using research in a large organization with embedded researchers. We also investigated staff capacity to engage with research to identify opportunities to strengthen the use of research-based evidence in practice.
Methods:
We conducted 14 semi-structured in-depth interviews between November 2022 and April 2023 with senior managers, middle managers, and frontline staff working in the blood collection department at Australian Red Cross Lifeblood. Directed qualitative content analysis and the SPIRIT Action Framework were used to interpret the data.
Results:
Capacity to engage with and use research varied greatly between participants and appeared to be affected by their role, training, and prior work experience. Participants valued research highly. However, only a few felt confident in their knowledge and skills to engage with research. Participants described a lack of visibility of research within the organization as well as systems and structures to access research. Experiences with accessing research, generating research, and interacting with researchers were mostly limited to senior managers. Research was chiefly used by senior managers to support changes, followed by understanding blood collection issues, and informing policy development. Although present, research use was often not visible to frontline staff.
Conclusions:
To increase research engagement and use, organizations should invest in strengthening their tools and systems, providing opportunities to increase individual knowledge and skills to engage with research, and increase the visibility of research and how it has been used.
More Related Videos
11:31Rapid Fractionation and Isolation of Whole Blood Components in Samples Obtained from a Community-based Setting
Published on: November 30, 2015
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Data Collection I
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Ethics in Research
Data Collection II
Blood Studies I: ABG and VBG
Arterial Blood Gas (ABG)
Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) studies are crucial for assessing the lungs' ability to supply oxygen and remove carbon dioxide, reflecting the patient's ventilation status. They also help understand the kidneys' capacity to...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...