Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Determining Immune System Suppression versus CNS Protection for Pharmacological Interventions in Autoimmune Demyelination
Published on: September 12, 2016
Specialist Neurology Involvement and Impact in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Neurotoxicity: Experience in a
Benjamin Schroeder1,2, Prakrit Prasad1, Ope Gbadegesin1
1Helen Durham Centre for Neuroinflammatory Diseases, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
Background:
Neurological immune related adverse events (N-irAEs) following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The early involvement of neurological services is therefore recommended to assist diagnosis and guide management. However, the practical experience of specialist neurology involvement is poorly understood.
Methods:
A multi-centre, retrospective case note review was performed in a unified healthcare setting in the United Kingdom via predetermined proforma to investigate the involvement and impact of neurology services in this setting.
Results:
One hundred and nine patients with N-irAE were identified with a median time from ICI treatment to symptom onset of 52 days. Neurology service models, reasons for referral and referral rates varied by centre. Overall, eighty-seven (79.8%) patients (range 52.9-100% by centre) had neurology involvement. Neurology input was associated with younger age (median 67.2 vs. 72.8 years), anatomical location (Central > Peripheral) and severity of neurotoxicity (p < 0.001, q < 0.004). Patients with neurology involvement were more likely to undergo specialist investigations: MR imaging (p = 0.041, q = 0.043), lumbar puncture (p < 0.001, q < 0.004), and neurophysiology (p = 0.005, q = 0.007) resulting in a broader range of specific N-irAE diagnoses. Steroids were appropriately prescribed, with second line treatment (Intravenous immunoglobulins/Plasma exchange) associated with neurology involvement. At lower grades (CTCAE ≤ 2), resolution rates were similar in those with or without neurology involvement. At grades 3-4, one-third of patients with neurology involvement had resolution. In a centre with a model of early neurology involvement for all possible N-irAEs the aetiology of the neurological presentation was changed in 63.7%.
Conclusions:
This study highlights the potential to improve diagnosis and treatment algorithms and therefore patient outcomes through development of uniform N-irAE models of care to support this area of growing clinical need.
More Related Videos
06:08Assessment of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell-Associated Toxicities Using an Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenograft Mouse Model
Published on: February 10, 2023
09:04Analysis of Human T Cell Activity in an Allogeneic Co-Culture Setting of Pre-Treated Tumor Cells
Published on: March 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors