Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
Explainable Deep Learning for Breast Lesion Classification in Digital and Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
Samara Acosta-Jiménez1, Miguel M Mendoza-Mendoza1, Carlos E Galván-Tejada1
1Unidad Académica de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Jardín Juárez 147, Centro, Zacatecas 98000, Mexico.
This study compares artificial intelligence (AI) performance in breast cancer screening using Digital Mammography (DM) and Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM). Results show both modalities yield explainable AI outcomes, with CESM excelling in certain classifications and DM showing superior performance in others.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
- Oncology
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise for breast cancer screening.
- Integration of AI across mammographic modalities like Digital Mammography (DM) and Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) needs further exploration.
- Understanding AI model behavior across DM and CESM is crucial for equitable clinical adoption.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the performance of three deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures (ResNet-18, DenseNet-121, EfficientNet-B0) on DM and CESM breast lesion classification.
- To analyze the decision-making patterns of these AI models across both mammographic modalities using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
Main Methods:
- Utilized the public CDD-CESM dataset comprising 2006 images for binary classification tasks (Normal vs. Benign, Benign vs. Malignant, Normal vs. Malignant).
- Trained CNN models separately on DM and CESM images using transfer learning, weighted binary cross-entropy loss, and a 3-fold cross-validation scheme.
- Employed SHAP analysis to visualize and interpret model decisions at a pixel level.
Main Results:
- CESM demonstrated superior performance in Normal vs. Benign and Benign vs. Malignant classifications.
- Digital Mammography (DM) achieved the highest discriminative ability in the Normal vs. Malignant comparison (EfficientNet-B0: AUC = 97%, Accuracy = 93.15%).
- SHAP analysis revealed consistent, anatomically relevant decision patterns for both modalities, with CESM providing sharper focus and DM showing broader attention.
Conclusions:
- CESM enhances lesion discrimination via functional contrast, while DM offers highly accurate and explainable results with CNNs, despite simpler acquisition.
- Consistent SHAP-based relevance across modalities confirms that both DM and CESM preserve clinically meaningful information for AI analysis.
- This study is the first to directly compare DM and CESM using explainable deep learning models under identical conditions.
More Related Videos
04:48Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
Published on: November 30, 2022
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018