Using Machine Learning Methods to Predict Cognitive Age from Psychophysiological Tests

Background/Objectives: This paper presents the results of predicting chronological age from psychophysiological tests using machine learning regressors. Methods: Subjects completed a series of psychological tests measuring various cognitive functions, including reaction time and cognitive conflict, short-term memory, verbal functions, and color and spatial perception. The sample included 99 subjects, 68 percent of whom were men and 32 percent were women. Based on the test results, 43 features were generated. To determine the optimal feature selection method, several approaches were tested alongside the regression models using MAE, R2, and CV_R2 metrics. SHAP and Permutation Importance (via Random Forest) delivered the best performance with 10 features. Features selected through Permutation Importance were used in subsequent analyses. To predict participants' age from psychophysiological test results, we evaluated several regression models, including Random Forest, Extra Trees, Gradient Boosting, SVR, Linear Regression, LassoCV, RidgeCV, ElasticNetCV, AdaBoost, and Bagging. Model performance was compared using the determination coefficient (R2) and mean absolute error (MAE). Cross-validated performance (CV_R2) was estimated via 5-fold cross-validation. To assess metric stability and uncertainty, bootstrapping (1000 resamples) was applied to the test set, yielding distributions of MAE and RMSE from which mean values and 95% confidence intervals were derived. Results: The study identified RidgeCV with winsorization and standardization as the best model for predicting cognitive age, achieving a mean absolute error of 5.7 years and an R2 of 0.60. Feature importance was evaluated using SHAP values and permutation importance. SHAP analysis showed that stroop_time_color and stroop_var_attempt_time were the strongest predictors, followed by several task-timing features with moderate contributions. Permutation importance confirmed this ranking, with these two features causing the largest performance drop when permuted. Partial dependence plots further indicated clear positive relationships between these key features and predicted age. Correlation analysis stratified by sex revealed that most features were significantly associated with age, with stronger effects generally observed in men. Conclusions: Feature selection revealed Stroop timing measures and task-related metrics from math and campimetry tests as the strongest predictors, reflecting core cognitive processes linked to aging. The results underscore the value of careful outlier handling, feature selection, and interpretable regularized models for analyzing psychophysiological data. Future work should include longitudinal studies and integration with biological markers to further improve clinical relevance.