Drug-Coated Balloons and Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissections

Marios Sagris1,2, Marios G Bantidos3, Nikolaos Stalikas4

  • 11st Department of Cardiology, Hippokration General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.

PubMed

Insights

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) requires tailored interventions. Drug-coated balloons and bioresorbable scaffolds offer promising "leave-nothing-behind" alternatives for SCAD percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a key cause of acute coronary syndromes, particularly in young women lacking traditional risk factors.
  • SCAD's unique pathophysiology and vessel fragility present significant revascularization challenges.
  • While conservative management is often preferred, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is necessary in select cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current limitations and pitfalls in SCAD percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • To explore the application of drug-coated balloons (DCB) and bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) as "leave-nothing-behind" strategies in SCAD.
  • To identify future research priorities for optimizing SCAD interventional management.

Main Methods:

  • Review of contemporary literature on SCAD management and interventional devices.
  • Analysis of mechanistic underpinnings and procedural applications of DCB and BRS in SCAD.
  • Discussion of intracoronary imaging (OCT/IVUS) role in SCAD interventions.

Main Results:

  • Drug-coated balloons (DCB) offer antiproliferative therapy without permanent vessel caging.
  • Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) provide temporary scaffolding with potential for biomechanical restoration upon resorption.
  • Both DCB and BRS present advantages and disadvantages, requiring careful patient selection.

Conclusions:

  • Optimal device strategies for SCAD-PCI remain under-researched, with current data being largely observational.
  • DCB and BRS are attractive alternatives in selected SCAD cases, offering "leave-nothing-behind" benefits.
  • Future research should prioritize head-to-head trials of DCB and evaluation of next-generation BRS for standardized, imaging-guided SCAD interventional algorithms.