Effectiveness of virtual reality to manage pain and anxiety in patients undergoing cystoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1Department of Medicine, University Centre FMABC, Santo André, Brazil.
- 2Department of Urology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
- 3Department of Medicine, Municipal University of São Caetano do Sul, São Caetano do Sul, Brazil.
- 4Department of Surgery, Hospital Santa Izabel, Salvador, Brazil.
- 5Department of Urology, Monterrey Institute of Technology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.
- 6Department of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah Hospital, South Surra, Kuwait.
- 7Department of Oncology, Hospital Adventista de Manaus, Manaus, Brazil.
- 8Department of Urology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
- 0Department of Medicine, University Centre FMABC, Santo André, Brazil.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Virtual reality (VR) distraction technologies did not significantly reduce pain or anxiety during cystoscopy procedures in a meta-analysis of four trials. Further research is needed to explore VR
Area Of Science
- Urology
- Medical Technology
- Pain Management
Background
- Cystoscopy procedures can cause significant patient anxiety and pain.
- Virtual reality (VR) distraction is a novel technology proposed to mitigate procedural discomfort.
- Evidence on VR's efficacy in urological procedures remains limited.
Purpose Of The Study
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the effectiveness of VR distraction technologies for managing pain and anxiety in patients undergoing cystoscopy.
- To evaluate the impact of VR on procedural pain, anxiety levels, and heart rate.
Main Methods
- A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to July 2024.
- Four randomized controlled trials involving 575 patients comparing VR distraction versus no VR distraction during cystoscopy were included.
- Data on patient-reported pain, anxiety, and post-procedural heart rate were pooled using a random-effects model.
Main Results
- The pooled analysis included 289 patients who used VR distraction.
- No statistically significant differences were found in patient-reported procedural pain (SMD -0.16; p=0.060), anxiety (SMD -0.37; p=0.6), or post-procedural heart rate (SMD -0.58; p=0.3) between VR and control groups.
- High heterogeneity was observed for anxiety (I²=93%) and heart rate (I²=97%) outcomes.
Conclusions
- The current meta-analysis indicates that VR distraction technology does not significantly alleviate pain or anxiety during cystoscopy.
- The findings suggest that VR may not be an effective intervention for managing patient discomfort in this specific urological procedure based on available evidence.
- Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to definitively assess VR's role in cystoscopy and other urological interventions.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

