Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026
3D Printing and In Situ Surface Modification via Type I Photoinitiated Reversible Addition-Fragmentation Chain Transfer Polymerization
Published on: February 18, 2022
Comparison of Mechanical, Surface, and Chemical Properties of Different Thermoplastic Retainer Materials before and
Yasemin Tunca1, Nihal Fahrzadeh2, Murat Tunca1
1Kütahya Health Sciences University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Kütahya, Türkiye.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface hardness, surface roughness, and chemical structure changes of four vacuum-formed retainer (VFR) materials after thermoforming.
Methods:
Four groups of VFR materials were evaluated: Taglus, Lumex-G, Atmos, and Duran. Each group consisted of 12 samples (n=12) that were thermoformed according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Surface roughness was measured using a high-precision profilometer, and hardness was assessed with a micro-Vickers hardness tester. Chemical structure analysis was conducted using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and surface morphology was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Results:
Hardness measurements demonstrated a general decrease across all groups following thermoforming. After thermoforming, surface roughness increased significantly in the Taglus and Lumex-G groups, whereas the Atmos and Duran groups maintained greater surface stability. FTIR demonstrated that all materials retained their chemical stability, and no significant changes in functional groups were detected. SEM results revealed more pronounced surface irregularities in the Taglus and Lumex-G groups.
Conclusion:
Polyethylene terephthalate glycol copolyester-based materials with high surface homogeneity, such as Atmos and Duran, may be recommended for clinical use due to their superior surface stability and chemical resilience. By contrast, the surface irregularities observed in Taglus and Lumex-G may compromise their long-term clinical performance.
